SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Tenchusatsu who wrote (1527924)3/8/2025 3:34:10 AM
From: i-node1 Recommendation

Recommended By
longz

  Read Replies (2) of 1576346
 
Musk can "free speech" whatever alternate realities he wants on X, but he can't "free speech" away these spectacular failures, ESPECIALLY if he wants SpaceX to "fix" the FAA.
SpaceX is a private business, but his customers include a lot of USA business. However, these rockets as you know are not as yet scheduled for production and it isn't like the old days where they were tested by putting astronauts in them and seeing what happened.

The testing process at SpaceX is fundamentally no different from what you do in your work or what I do in mine; but it is a matter of particular domain and scale.

The object is to test and re-test until the problems have been defeated. You don't see Musk breaking out in sweat over it because he understands this is the nature of iteration to establish statistically reliable launches.

CBS carried an article claiming "Starship breaks apart after launch in second failure in a row".

Reality is every launch this far, 8 I think, has technically been a failure. It is how we learn.

You've made mistakes in your work that you learned from, and I guarantee I have, as well. I doubt that large projects are any easier, although sometimes they make it look like it is.

Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext