ACLY- ACCELR8. Year 2000 Stock Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : ACLY- ACCELR8. Year 2000 Stock

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Mr Logic who wrote (1121)	2/23/1998 12:14:00 PM
From: ThirdEye	Read Replies (1) of 1518

<<Wouldn't the reverse would be true? One of the significant reasons for the high cost of the y2k fix is that many companies are taking the opportunity to migrate from old systems sooner rather than later, replacing them with new, y2k compliant applications. >> Nope. Maybe that's true elsewhere(I doubt it), but not in the case of the DEC base. Why? Because, as has been stated previously on this thread, there are 7K DEC applications and only 1200 NT applications. Why leave behind the stuff you use and know for a new, unknown application that doesn't fit your needs? First get your software(and your database) compliant, then migrate, bringing everything you had before with you.

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next