Brumar, Hegseth actually makes some good points in his response to Eyeliner Vance:
VP: I understand your concerns – and fully support you raising w/ POTUS. Important considerations, most of which are tough to know how they play out (economy, Ukraine peace, Gaza, etc). I think messaging is going to be tough no matter what – nobody knows who the Houthis are – which is why we would need to stay focused on: 1) Biden failed & 2) Iran funded,” wrote Hegseth. “Waiting a few weeks or a month does not fundamentally change the calculus. 2 immediate risks on waiting: 1) this leaks, and we look indecisive; 2) Israel takes an action first – or Gaza cease fire falls apart – and we don’t get to start this on our own terms. We can manage both. We are prepared to execute, and if I had final go or no go vote, I believe we should. This [is] not about the Houthis. I see it as two things: 1) Restoring Freedom of Navigation, a core national interest; and 2) Reestablish deterrence, which Biden cratered. But, we can easily pause. And if we do, I will do all we can to enforce 100% OPSEC. But Eyeliner Vance seems to be more concerned about "bailing Europe out again."
Which proves one thing: Vance cares more about sucking up to Trump than even "Two drink minimum" Hegseth is.
At least Hegseth recognizes that freedom of navigation is a core national interest, even if Europe relies more upon the Suez Canal than the U.S. does.
In any case, this is a very revealing look inside the inner workings of the Trump regime. Despite what it seems, not everyone is 100% committed toward demolishing America both at home and abroad.
Tenchusatsu |