SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Canadian Political Free-for-All
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Goose94 who wrote (34347)3/25/2025 5:21:43 PM
From: Cogito Ergo Sum  Read Replies (2) of 37182
 
I suggested well over a decade ago on SI that we should have nukes.. many times I suggested it. we wouldn't have many targets.. 3 actually.. with prolly the most like combattant.. at 95% of total threat being the US. Do ya think 51st state would be an issue if we were so armed. China and Russia.. 5% total.. not even really since US would never allow either on its doorstep.. which brings to light the US BS that they are defending us.. they aren't.. wr are so close though that an attack on us would be considered an attack on them.. they would be defending themselves.. likely the US would be the only invader..
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  

HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News