SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Politics for Pros- moderated

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
From: isopatch4/9/2025 9:20:45 PM
5 Recommendations

Recommended By
Bill
goldworldnet
Maple MAGA
Mick Mørmøny
Stock Puppy

  Read Replies (2) of 793883
 
Very Good News. < BREAKING: House Passes Rep. Darrell Issa’s No Rogue Rulings Act to Limit Rogue Activist District Court Judges – One Republican Votes “No”

by Jordan Conradson

Apr. 9, 2025 7:23 pm

207 Comments



The U.S. House of Representatives has passed Rep. Darrell Issa’s (R-CA) No Rogue Rulings Act, which will place restrictions on federal District Court judges from issuing nationwide injunctions.

One Republican voted to empower activist judges.

The new law will stop a single district court judge, one out of 677 across the nation, from dictating policy for the entire country, as we’ve seen countless times from Trump-hating activist judges.

This comes after the Supreme Court vacated Judge James Boasberg’s orders barring the Trump Administration’s removals of Venezuelan gang members under the Alien Enemies Act. They ruled that Boasberg, as a single district court judge, lacked jurisdiction to dictate the President’s policy.

Because Feeling Fine Doesn’t Mean You’re Actually Fine: The Silent Threat of Stroke and Heart Disease

Supreme Court Chief Justice Roberts on Monday also indefinitely blocked another judge’s order requiring the return of alleged MS-13 gang member Kilmar Abrego Garcia.

Rep. Issa, the bill's sponsor, noted that previously, the Supreme Court heard less than 70 cases per year, but now they are needed to intervene “every couple of days in order to handle these activist judges.”

Issa recently discussed his bill and the Democrats' hypocritical opposition with Fox's Stuart Varney.

"They don't like it because it might make life a little more fluid for the Trump administration, but they absolutely wanted it till the last days of the Biden administration," he said.

WATCH:

Issa: Well, the most important part is that the Supreme Court, which sees about 62 to 66 cases a year, is now seeing a case every couple of days in order to handle these activist judges, and they are consistently slapping down these judges for their overly broad injunctions and, in some cases, just reversing them. But we've got to, we've got to maintain the nature of the court. The High Court speaks for the nation. District Courts speak for their districts. This bill returns that to where it belongs and where it was for the first almost 200 years of our history.

Varney: The Democrats say you are destroying democracy by challenging the courts like this, and your response is?

Issa: The Solicitor General of the Biden administration, as late as mid-October of last year, was asking for what we're delivering on the floor. It’s only a question of a shoe on the other foot. They don't like it because it might make life a little more fluid for the Trump administration, but they absolutely wanted it till the last days of the Biden administration.

Rep Darrell Issa discusses his No Rogue Rulings Act>

Open url & scroll dn. article text to access the video

thegatewaypundit.com
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext