SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Microcap & Penny Stocks : ACRT about to move to new highs
ACRT 0.110-7.6%Dec 30 4:00 PM EST

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: docsox who wrote (1717)2/24/1998 11:10:00 AM
From: Dan Packer  Read Replies (1) of 7054
 
This is a jump ball ~ A TAD question:

If a company in South Korea makes a deal to buy some semiconductor equipment from the US - say from MRS - decides to use TADs, does it go this way? => They agree to the deal.
ROK, Inc. arranges for the TAD.
ACRT pays MRS.
ROK gets the machine.
Then the Won does a swan.
ROK can't pay off the TAD.
Do they return the machine to MRS?
Return it to ACRT?
Keep it and pay off the TAD in fractional Won?
Keep it, reorganize under the bankruptcy statutes of ROK? And stiff ACRT and their TAD?

Or we could do the reverse.

If the Won does a Swan, can you keep the TAD on?
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext