SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Biotech / Medical : Immunomedics (IMMU) - moderated

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
Recommended by:
jhcimmu
To: dorightbythem who wrote (63132)6/11/2025 1:00:38 PM
From: Olecranon1 Recommendation  Read Replies (1) of 63283
 
Perhaps I was a little too glib in my first statement regarding SRPT risks.
Just to put some flesh on the bones:
  • ELEVIDYS is SRPT’s current and future revenue elephant. ELEVIDYS has already received accelerated approval and RFKJr cannot revoke that approval by caveat. But the confirmatory trial is due to readout in late 2025. In the event that it doesn’t confirm, that would be a huge blow, however unlikely.
  • But even with approval, the advisory committee, currently being reconstituted, could narrow CMS payment guidelines, which would obviously hit its mostly pediatric population very hard.
  • ELEVIDIS is already approved in Japan and is expected to be approved in Europe in the near term, which generates revenues insulated from RFKJr. regardless of any tinkering with CMS payments
  • Meanwhile, as Stockdoc has pointed out, Prasad recently said that HHS is not going after ELEVIDIS since it has prior approval: “I heard that new guy at FDA that spooked everyone (Prasad) about SRPT was interviewed by Goldman Sachs yesterday and was point blank asked if FDA was going to pull Elevydis approval. He stated that was not going to happen and that the FDA is looking forward and not going to revisit prior approvals.”
  • It’s theoretically possible thar RFKJr could go after SRPTs PMO triumvirate, which is still contributing 1/3 of SRPT’s revenue and profit. But being less expensive, with a longer marketing history, and a prior approval, PMO also seems off the table for attack.
So yes, there are risks, but the recent haircut in share price is consistent with an already executed narrowing of CMS guidelines for Elevidis, rather than some discounted future possibility.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext