SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : View from the Center and Left Middle East Annex

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
From: S. maltophilia6/17/2025 2:36:25 PM
1 Recommendation

Recommended By
Arthur Radley

   of 3198
 
The bronxed baboon, as usual will be outsmarted and out maneuverd by Netanyahu, as we continue to get sucked in to his wars:

zeteo.com

Continues as:
.....What Will Trump Do?

The challenge for Israel of pulling the US into another Middle East war is a proposition of a whole different order of magnitude compared to the successful bamboozling of the Trump administration in the last half year.

Given that the Trump team had so little experience, familiarity, or depth on this (and not only this) negotiating file, stacking the deck to scupper those negotiations was relatively easy, as it was on Gaza.

First, Israel tried to push the so-called Libyan model – offering Iran the relishing prospect of complete capitulation, followed by pursuing a military intervention to secure regime change anyway. More effective was the effort to replace a negotiation premised on Iran's nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT) rights to limited domestic civilian nuclear enrichment with one that insisted on zero enrichment. That, in turn, helped create the sense of negotiation impasse, which likely had Trump green-light Israel's attack as a way of getting Iran to re-engage more on American terms. Having thus duped team Trump, Netanyahu launched his strategy of precipitation, initiating action on the assumption that you could cajole your bigger ally into joining forces with you.

That strategy – and a whole lot more that flows from it – now hangs in the balance. Trump must choose whether to stop the war, join the war, or, in dilly-dallying and failing to decide, allow himself to become a prisoner of unpredictable circumstances and Netanyahu’s machinations.

Make no mistake, if Trump insists on Israel bringing this to a close, that is what will happen. And he has good reason to do so – from the political balance of power inside the MAGA world and its base of supporters to economic spillover effects and the potential of Israeli-encouraged Middle Eastern military adventures to derail entire presidencies.

Netanyahu is in full press mode, not just to get additional US weapons deliveries and diplomatic and economic support. Netanyahu is determined for this to become America's war. Netanyahu's campaign in US media is hardly subtle. Israel will use every lever and ounce of its lobbying muscle to drive such an outcome in DC.

But it will go much further. Netanyahu’s bag of tricks will include escalating provocations designed to produce an Iranian reaction that enhances the prospect of US military engagement.

The obvious one would be Iran or Iranian-backed armed groups directly targeting US assets – something they have not done thus far. In any hair-trigger situation, the prospect also exists of false flag operations. An act of Israeli subterfuge (making a hit on something American look like it was coming from Iran), cannot be ruled out. Israel might achieve the same outcome if the Iranian political reaction to Israel's unlawful aggression generates a US counter-response – for instance, if Iran expels IAEA inspectors from its nuclear facilities or withdraws from the Non-Proliferation Treaty ( steps apparently being considered). And, of course, there is the possibility that Iran, at some point, changes its traditional position and decides that Israel’s latest adventurism forces it to actually push towards the nuclear weapons capability it has hitherto eschewed.

Share

Should the US and Iran move to resume negotiations, Netanyahu and his chorus will push the line that it’s a demonstration of Iranian weakness, and that Israel must be allowed to finish the job.

Because the longer this goes on, two additional factors will come into play. First, circumstantial factors, happenstance driving events – for instance, if there are casualties of US citizens in Iran's strikes on Israel. Secondly, and if this continues, then with the passage of time and as the US actively intervenes on the defensive side to support Israel, as well as in the possible provision of new and more devastating arms, and as the death and destruction inside Iran mount, it will become increasingly politically untenable for Iran to pretend it is only fighting Israel. As in Gaza, this may already be America’s war ( this excellent thread by analyst Mouin Rabbani unpacks such a scenario).

In many ways, this is a defining moment for MAGA – is it an America-first or an Israel-first movement?

Decentering Israel’s Genocide in Gaza

Whichever way that call goes, and alongside the pain already inflicted on the Iranian side, Israel can almost certainly point to an additional significant achievement in opening this new front – it has decentered the daily cruelty still being inflicted on Palestinians and has deflated the galvanizing challenge to Israel's ever more transparent genocide. For now, at least, the illegal seizure of the Madleen Freedom Flotilla ship and mistreatment of Greta Thunberg and co., the abomination to humanitarian aid principles known as the Gaza Humanitarian Foundation, and the daily death toll of dozens in Gaza are getting less attention.

What we all just witnessed was Israel instigating an unlawful act of aggression against Iran's territorial integrity and sovereignty, again making a mockery of the UN charter and its membership in that body. That act was carried out by a state that is recognized to have nuclear weapons and is not a member of the NPT against a state that is a member of the NPT and does not have a nuclear deterrent.

Israel's military strikes also violated provisions for the protection of nuclear infrastructure, described by IAEA Director General Rafael Grossi as a grave breach of nuclear safety, incurring the danger of radiological contamination.

Yet Israel's Western enablers are back in their comfort zone, describing the danger not of Israel's actual nuclear program, but of Iran's potential future nuclear threat, proclaiming Israel’s right to defend itself when it is the aggressor. The latest G7 statement demonstrates how divorced from both reality and most of the world the leadership of the West has become. In other words, they’re in their happy place of Israel as the victim – parroting Israeli narratives and talking points, just as they have done, not only through decades of Israel deploying illegal occupation and an apartheid regime against the Palestinians, but also through these long months of starvation, displacement, and relentless war crimes in Gaza.

The course that [Israel] is on can never deliver well-being or security for the people of the region or for Israelis themselves.

Will Western opinion buy it? Polls were already showing that public support and sympathy for Israel in Western Europe has hit the lowest level ever recorded by YouGov, and even in the US, a poll from April shows views among Republican adults under 50 have dramatically shifted in the last three years, with 50% saying they view Israel negatively, compared to 35% in 2022 (the numbers among Democrat voters – as opposed to elected officials – consistently show unfavorable ratings for Israel and support for sanctions).

Many have refused to avert our eyes from Gaza, and the focus will return for others.

Meanwhile, Israel has moved yet more forces into the occupied West Bank, imposed a siege on the area, and isolated all Palestinian towns, placing each under a lockdown.

So, attempts to position Israel as a worthy ally rather than a rogue state no longer pass the laugh test for ever-growing numbers of citizens.

Share

It's too early to know whether this latest act of hubristic criminality will constitute the moment of overreach for Israel that finally generates the desperately needed change of course.

The course that the country is on can never deliver well-being or security for the people of the region or for Israelis themselves. Whether in Gaza, the West Bank, East Jerusalem, Iran, Syria, or Lebanon, Israel's actions are those of an extreme state with a destabilizing, radicalizing, and revisionist agenda. This may even be the moment more Israelis acknowledge the suicidal path their government is on.

International law and accountability must be applied fairly and universally, as advocated by the new Hague Group. A ceasefire must not only be imposed immediately but also comprehensively, and not least, for Gaza.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext