SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Brumar89 who wrote (1543677)6/20/2025 11:14:27 AM
From: Brumar891 Recommendation

Recommended By
Doren

  Read Replies (1) of 1582912
 
TWO WEEKS: Our ears pricked up yesterday when White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt took to the podium to read a statement from Trump on Iran: “I will make my decision whether or not to go within the next two weeks.”

“Within two weeks,” as many longtime Trump-watchers leapt to note, has been Trump’s favorite unit of time for nearly a decade now. In fact, Andrew found an Axios piece yesterday that was written in his very first week as a journalist, back in June 2017. It noted that Trump had already used the “we’ll be announcing within two weeks” framework on taxes, on wiretapping, on the timetable for his infrastructure plan, on the Paris Climate Accords, on the war against ISIS. “Trump’s timeline?” read the headline. “Always ‘two weeks.’”

More recently, “two weeks” has been Trump’s go-to timetable even for supposedly quick-time decisions on military conflicts. Eight weeks ago, Trump told reporters he’d know whether he could trust Vladimir Putin in “about two weeks.” Three weeks ago, he announced that the White House would find out whether Putin was “tapping us along” within “a week and a half, two weeks.” As with many such pronouncements in the past, we’re all still waiting.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext