Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

Recommended by:

locogringo

longz

To: denizen48 who wrote (1545013)	6/26/2025 1:23:03 AM
From: nicewatch	2 Recommendations Read Replies (2) of 1583412

For years CNN's money has been made on anti-Trump themes. That's all they've ever had, and he was actually good for their biz. Are you aware to the extent you saw CNN plastered on airport TVs, especially international airports (and their international outfit is often different anchors than what you see in America airports), CNN paid those airports money to broadcast it 24/7 to boost ad revenue. No joke, and it's well known and has been exposed in media advertisement news many years ago. Try to keep up, please. This young lady was early on Steele Russian dossier hoax (funded by Team Cankles Clinton), Hunter Biden laptop was a Russian Psyop, and now this? Maybe you are that clueless? :-) _________________________________________________________________________________ Everybody has some analysis of the situation in the Middle East which is in the middle of a ceasefire between Israel and Iran after The USA bombed three nuclear sites in Iran. And even the bombing is controversial as a 33-year old reporter, Natasha Bertrand, said there is a leaked DIA document saying the bombs are no good and perhaps the Iranian nuke setback was only a few months. It was then noted that Ms Bertrand was the first reporter to push the idea that the Hunter Biden laptop was disinformation. Not noted was the fact that she was also an early pusher of the Steele Dossier as real. So she is doing her job as a deep state stooge from some perspectives. But nobody has attacked her directly. Why? Is she right about the bombs? Her reward thus far are two Emmy Awards for reporting on the Ukraine war. Of course until a YouTuber or blogger gets to the sites we’ll never know what damage was actually done. One thing to note, all the coverage kvetching about the supposed DIA leak by right wing media included complaints about the reporter without ever mentioning her name. Only Instapundit called her out by name in its analysis. What is going on here?

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next