NAMX -- North American Expl.-- Que Sera Sera! Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Microcap & Penny Stocks : NAMX -- North American Expl.-- Que Sera Sera!

NAMX 0.0001000

0.0%

Mar 7 3:00 PM EST

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: SOROS who wrote (2749)	2/24/1998 5:53:00 PM
From: FIRENZA	Read Replies (4) of 4736

Dear Mr. Soros: As an individual investor, I too am sick of the nonsense on this thread. While your proposal is very noble, it really isn't the place to settle this dispute. No one knows who is lying or who is telling the truth, who is pretending to be someone else here, and on and on. Face it, an internet thread is not the place for these parties to settle their dispute. NAMX has decided to file a suit against certain of these individuals (Hunter Vann) among them. That means it should be settled in a court of law. In fact, I couldn't imagine ANY company agreeing to debate an issue such as this on an internet thread while litigation was pending. Anyone who thinks a corporate attorney would allow his client to engage in such an activity is being naive. (no offense Mr. Soros) Why anyone in their right mind who is a party to a suit like this would continue to post is beyond me. If Mr. Vann has an attorney, I am very surprised that his attorney hasn't advised him of this. Every post just gives more material for possible prosecution. It just makes no sense. Mr. Soros, I have checked with KN Energy as Mr. Van suggested. They confirmed that there was a contract with NAMX. I called Triton and spoke to Kevin over there after Mr. Vann left a post and asked precisely the question he posed on the thread (that post seems to have been removed) and again Mr. Vann's attack was proven unfounded. Then today Mr. Vann trying to give the impression that he was not involved in a law suit. So I did what I could to check it out. Indeed I found out that he is the defendant in a suit filed against him by NAMX. I really have seen enough. I think it's pretty easy to make a conclusion here.

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next