SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Pastimes : All Things Weather and Mother Nature
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Don Green who wrote (795)7/20/2025 10:10:06 AM
From: Thomas A Watson1 Recommendation

Recommended By
longz

   of 924
 
The only AI that can do what is true in solving with the highest level of confidence is Grok running in learning mode and not the basic inference modes. There have been numerous tests that suggest this.
This is based upon my analysis of the Soon request of Grok to write a paper and what I judged to be fair and balanced objective rules of providing balanced data.

Who is qualified to know objective data. Am I. I have never seen a paper supporting CO2 doom. I have seen numerous presentation showing objective date the suggested or proved science proffer.

I will say you believe that there is a strong counterpoint is nonsensical to me. I have used the basic AI and asked the question, show me the objective data showing CO2 is driving global warming.

Finstine or Einstein 101, If you cannot explain it simply you do not understand it. In this case it is not at all.

I do not consider the consensus popularity of something as anything but a joke fools science.

There is no objective data. All analysis I have done to understand the actual process of conduction convective and radiative heat transfer from the Earth's surface to space would intuitively suggest a possible increase in heat transf suggesting a very small non measurable cooling effect.

The increase in bio mass creation on land area would suggest lower temperature in green area as 30%?? more energy is being strore and not doing immediate heating of surroundings. So the hottest days where heat would be the most pain in ass would not get as hot. In the fall that biomass will oxidize and days might be warmer as it oxidizes. Thicker biomas would slow the rate of ground freezing.

Snow cover spring melt. If bushes and trees have shafts of biomas with dark skins the rate of snow melt will be much faster vs barren of grass covered area. Growing cycle duration should increase.

Wildlife except to the poor Polar bears will have more habitat.

SHOW ME THE DATA about anyting getting worse. Scientist say is not objective data.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  

HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News