SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : The Financial Collapse of 2001 Unwinding

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: elmatador who wrote (13617)7/23/2025 11:07:54 AM
From: robert b furman1 Recommendation

Recommended By
elmatador

  Read Replies (1) of 13770
 
Trump needs help geting US E&P's to take an expensive risk on LNG from Alaska.

A LNG line that is in Alaska has been a dream for de ades now.

It is a necessary ingredient to get US E&P's to risk the cost of winter only drilling on the tundra of the North Slope.

If Trump can get a LNG pipeline to the West (Some have wanted a parallel line next to the Alyeska pipeline (which is down to 25% utilization), a second revenue source will bolster the desire for more drilling for oil.

Environmentally, it is a BIG PLUS, since flaring into the pristine country unspoiled by anything is a BIG step to gain support.

I also foresee the dual fuel electrical generation of power at site will be in the specs for even being able to bid. Cat has a dal fuel diesel/ natural gas engine that saves 1 million dollars every 1000 hours of running. It reduces the number of truck loads of diesel needed to drill.

Some technical issues are slowly coming together to make it work.

Using natural gas from the well, and a paid for LNG pipeline vs flaring are two huge obsticles removed from making it commercially viable.

I'm thinking it will get done, all in due time.

Bob
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext