Lets see....you were a "limited partner", you were 'hyping' this scam on the internet, the SEC hauled your a** in and you had to pay "restitution", then you tell the shareholders you hyped into your scam that you have "no idea" why the stock was halted.....when you knew very well it was YOU that was responsible for much of the mess. All the EMail I rec'd said you hyped the stock....then you have the gall to reprimand GRNO shareholders for not doing enuff DD!!! A guy who admits to NO DD on RMIL!!!! WHAT A FRAUD!!! WHAT A PHONEY!!! Then, in the ultimate delusionary act of arrogance, you claim me & Riley are doing what you got busted for!!! <lol> Where is s martin on that one!! <lol> >>>>Why doesn't Tonto turn in your scalp for a merit badge?
_________________________________________________
>>>>Subject: Green Oasis Environmental, Inc. (GRNO)
| Previous | Next | Respond |
You have 10 unread messages
To: Jack Kanak (6707 )
From: Ron Reece Friday, Jul 11 1997 6:18PM EST
Reply # of 8824
Jack,
Thanks from a fellow shareholder for keeping an eye on the store while
we were distracted... :0)
It is indeed encouraging to see GRNO issuing press releases once more,
especially with the flow rate reports for final product. We limited
partners had the information already due to our interest in the machine,
but I was waiting for GRNO to officially release it before discussing
the results.
Keep in mind that GRNO has been limited to running at 275 gallons/hr due
to the constraints of the antiquated 1993 DHEC permit. This machine will
clearly produce much more than 192 gallons of diesel per hour once the
governor(ie:"ment") is removed from the equation.
Obviously, we all realized that the AOS acquisition was a non-event once
the SEC halt commenced. Better to get this company in a financially
stronger position and THEN commence buyouts of waste oil collectors. But
who knows?? I'm sure that Bill is keeping GRNO's options open for the
immediate future.
Finally, an opinion. Knowing that John Andersen's law firm has been
replaced by a VERY highly regarded firm in Atlanta, Rogers & Hardin, I'm
convinced that all future news releases on GRNO's part will be in full
compliance with SEC wishes. It has been 4 months since the SEC first
began their investigation and we haven't seen a criminal complaint filed
against GRNO as of yet (knock on wood... :0)
Seems to me that this situation will eventually fade in nothingness. (If
the shareholders permit it... :0)
Not pleasant to think that the SEC will choose not to offer an
explanation for its actions, but life must go on. My opinon, if a
substantial action were to be taken by the SEC against GRNO, it would
have happened by now.
Any nay-sayers out there? Please offer some form of precedent example...
:0)
Regards,
Ron <<<<<<
_____________________________
Pugs
RMIL & TVSI LOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOONG |
