SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: IC720 who wrote (1549763)7/28/2025 8:40:38 AM
From: IC7202 Recommendations

Recommended By
longz
miraje

  Read Replies (1) of 1578294
 
Are Volcanoes Erupting to Prove Climate Change is BS & Nature is in Charge?





My concern on a correlation basis is that what we do know is that the Earth’s magnetic field has been weakening over the past 160+ years (by about 9% per century since 1840). Then there is the South Atlantic Anomaly (a region over the Atlantic where the field is unusually weak), which some scientists suggest could be an early sign of instability, and this is growing. Studies of past reversals (like the Laschamps Excursion, 41,000 years ago) show that field strength drops significantly before a reversal.

It appears that as the field weakens, this should result in greater volatility in volcanic activity as we enter solar minimum. That raises the risk of a catastrophic volcanic winter period after 2029, which would extend into our computer target for 2032. This is why I suggest that you should have 2 years of food in reserve. What correlates with all of this is the disease cycle. Plagues follow volcanic winters for food production declines, and as malnutrition rises, so does disease.

What we must understand about cycles is that, given our entry into this high in July 2025, we have witnessed much higher volatility than expected. This suggests that, as we turn back down into solar minimum, ideally reaching the bottom of the ECM in 2028 or early 2029, the resulting decline should be lower than expected. Whenever you rise with greater volatility, it is like a market that crashes harder. That said, if we are to experience a similar event to the Sun falling into a Maunder-minimum-like (inactive) state (1645-1715), which created the mini-Ice Age, it appears that we must be concerned, as it has been 309.6 years since that event in general. If we observe an equally violent contraction, then we should expect greater activity from the Ring of Fire, and that 2022 marked a significant low in earthquakes.



Solar Minima appear to be occurring close to a 309.6-year cycle. There have been many studies on the impact of UV and gamma radiation during solar changes and events. Gamma rays are a form of electromagnetic radiation, as are radio waves, infrared radiation, ultraviolet radiation, X-rays, and microwaves. Gamma rays can be used to treat cancer, and astronomers study gamma-ray bursts. What becomes concerning is the potential for a pole shift. The poles on the sun shift every 11 years, meaning it takes 22 years to complete the cycle. The Moon does not have a global magnetic field today, so it doesn’t experience regular pole shifts like the Sun or Earth.



We have a pole shift, climate change, and volcanic eruptions seem to be interlinked on a correlated basis. Our correlation models have indicated that this is something that warrants further investigation. For the first time, laying out this record yields a single geological archive, establishing a precise chronological order. These types of events can occur, perhaps even instantly. Scientists for decades argued that such earth changes were slow, gradual events. Then the discovery of the frozen woolly rhinos and mammoths ignited the Enlightenment era.

The discovery of frozen woolly mammoths with food still in their stomachs is one of the most fascinating pieces of evidence supporting the idea that a sudden, catastrophic climate shift in the past may be the norm, not the exception. Many mammoths (like the famous Beresovka mammoth) were found with undigested food in their stomachs and mouths, including grasses, buttercups, and other temperate plants. This suggests they died suddenly, with no time to digest their last meal. Some specimens were so well-preserved that their flesh was still edible when discovered.



The traditional gradual ice-age theory cannot explain how mammoths froze so quickly that their stomach contents remained intact. A sudden, extreme drop in temperature possibly due to a cosmic impact, volcanic activity, or a geomagnetic shift. Some have suggested that there was massive flooding or mudslides from melting permafrost or glacial outbursts that buried them rapidly before scavengers could decompose them. A pole shift or rapid climate change could cause Arctic regions to freeze almost instantly. This is the catastrophic view of panic-like cycles in a sudden market crash versus the uniform belief that the government can control the economy. Mainstream science often favors slow climate change, but the frozen mammoths suggest a rapid, catastrophic event was the outcome. This Gradialism/Uniformity view vs Catastrophism simply does not hold up with the evidence and is more like Marx and Keynes, who defy the business cycle and argued that government can control the economy and lead us to the land of utopian economics.


Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext