Santacruz Silver Produces 3,547,054 Silver Equivalent Ounces in Q2 2025               		                                                     Including 1,423,081 ounces of silver and 21,148 tonnes of zinc 
  newswire.ca  			  				News provided by 				 					 						 							 								  							 						 						Santacruz Silver Mining Ltd. 							 								 									 								 							 							 						 						 					 				 				Jul 29, 2025, 17:00 ET
   VANCOUVER, BC, July 29, 2025 /CNW/ - Santacruz Silver Mining Ltd. (TSXV:  SCZ)  (OTCQX: SCZMF) (FSE: 1SZ) ("Santacruz" or the "Company") reports its Q2  2025 production results from its Bolivar mine, Porco mine, Caballo  Blanco Group of mines ("Caballo Blanco") and the San Lucas Group which  includes the Reserva Mina and the San Lucas feed sourcing business ("San Lucas"), all located in Bolivia, and the Zimapan mine located in Mexico.
   Q2 2025 Production Highlights: Silver Equivalent Production: 3,547,054 silver equivalent ounces Silver Production: 1,423,081 ounces Zinc Production: 21,148 tonnes Lead Production: 2,773 tonnes Copper Production: 229 tonnes Underground Development: 11,531 meters
   Arturo Préstamo, Executive Chairman and CEO of Santacruz, commented,  "Santacruz maintained robust and stable production levels during the  second quarter of 2025, and, notably, San Lucas  reaffirmed its strategic importance within the Company this quarter,  successfully compensating for the slower production from the Bolivar  mine. From Q1 2025 to Q2 2025, consolidated throughput remained stable,  increasing slightly by 2%; however, consolidated silver equivalent  production decreased by 4%, with silver ounces declining 11%. The  reductions were primarily driven by flooding at the Bolivar mine, which  was caused by an unexpected water inflow event that temporarily exceeded  the system's designed pumping capacity. As a result, access to the  high-grade Pomabamba and Nane silver stopes at the Bolivar mine was  suspended. The water overflow has now been resolved, and work on both  stopes is gradually being restored to normal. Consolidated Zinc  production was roughly unchanged, with a slight 2% decrease. Looking at  the second half of the year, we remain focused on maximizing silver  production and metallurgical recoveries across all our operations, an  approach that is especially important in today's favorable silver price  environment."
   Production Summary – Total 
                                 Production Table
    |         
    
   2025 Q2
    |        2025 Q1
    |        Change
   Q2 vs Q1
    |         
    
   2024 Q2
    |         
   Change  Q2 vs Q2
    |        2025 YTD
    |        2024 YTD
    |        Change
   '25 YTD vs  '24 YTD
    |                     Material Processed (tonnes milled) 
    |        480,863
    |        471,773
    |        2 %
    |        500,755
    |        (4 %)
    |        952,637
    |        971,503
    |        (2 %)
    |                     Silver Equivalent Produced (ounces) (1) 
    |        3,547,054
    |        3,688,129
    |        (4 %)
    |        4,166,364
    |        (15 %)
    |        7,235,183
    |        8,042,752
    |        (10 %)
    |                     
  |        
  |        
  |        
  |        
  |        
  |        
  |        
  |        
  |                     Production
    |        
  |        
  |        
  |        
  |        
  |        
  |        
  |        
  |                       Silver (ounces)
    |        1,423,081
    |        1,590,063
    |        (11 %)
    |        1,671,359
    |        (15 %)
    |        3,013,144
    |        3,253,308
    |        (7 %)
    |                       Zinc (tonnes) 
    |        21,148
    |        20,719
    |        2 %
    |        25,052
    |        (16 %)
    |        41,868
    |        47,899
    |        (13 %)
    |                       Lead (tonnes)
    |        2,773
    |        2,718
    |        2 %
    |        2,908
    |        (5 %)
    |        5,491
    |        5,861
    |        (6 %)
    |                       Copper (tonnes)
    |        229
    |        279
    |        (18 %)
    |        539
    |        (19 %)
    |        507
    |        539
    |        (6 %)
    |                                                        (1)
    |        Silver  Equivalent Produced (ounces) have been calculated using prices of  $31.41/oz, $2,775.53/t, $2,085.90/t and $9,762.69/t for silver, zinc,  lead and copper respectively applied to the metal production divided by  the silver price as stated here.
    |                            Bolivar Mine 
                                 Bolivar Production Table (1)
    |         
    
   2025 Q2
    |        2025 Q1
    |        Change
   Q2 vs Q1
    |         
    
   2024 Q2
    |         
   Change 
   Q2 vs Q2
    |        2025 YTD
    |        2024 YTD
    |        Change
   '25 YTD vs  '24 YTD
    |                     Material Processed (tonnes milled) 
    |        54,803
    |        62,356
    |        (12 %)
    |        72,151
    |        (24 %)
    |        117,159
    |        144,952
    |        (19 %)
    |                     Silver Equivalent Produced (ounces) (2) 
    |        601,516
    |        786,299
    |        (24 %)
    |        904,204
    |        (33 %)
    |        1,387,815
    |        1,803,560
    |        (23 %)
    |                     
  |        
  |        
  |        
  |        
  |        
  |        
  |        
  |        
  |                     Production
    |        
  |        
  |        
  |        
  |        
  |        
  |        
  |        
  |                       Silver (ounces)
    |        304,468
    |        421,039
    |        (28 %)
    |        427,665
    |        (29 %)
    |        725,507
    |        853,421
    |        (15 %)
    |                       Zinc (tonnes) 
    |        3,225
    |        3,983
    |        (19 %)
    |        5,168
    |        (38 %)
    |        7,208
    |        10,231
    |        (30 %)
    |                       Lead (tonnes)
    |        182
    |        201
    |        (9 %)
    |        300
    |        (39 %)
    |        383
    |        694
    |        (45 %)
    |                     
  |        
  |        
  |        
  |        
  |        
  |        
  |        
  |        
  |                     Average Grade
    |        
  |        
  |        
  |        
  |        
  |        
  |        
  |        
  |                       Silver (g/t)
    |        190
    |        237
    |        (20 %)
    |        207
    |        (8 %)
    |        215
    |        203
    |        6 %
    |                       Zinc (%)
    |        6.52
    |        7.00
    |        (7 %)
    |        7.83
    |        (17 %)
    |        6.77
    |        7.75
    |        (13 %)
    |                       Lead (%)
    |        0.44
    |        0.47
    |        (6 %)
    |        0.57
    |        (22 %)
    |        0.46
    |        0.65
    |        (30 %)
    |                     
  |        
  |        
  |        
  |        
  |        
  |        
  |        
  |        
  |                     Metal Recovery
    |        
  |        
  |        
  |        
  |        
  |        
  |        
  |        
  |                       Silver (%)
    |        91
    |        89
    |        3 %
    |        89
    |        2 %
    |        90
    |        90
    |        (1 %)
    |                       Zinc (%) 
    |        90
    |        91
    |        (1 %)
    |        92
    |        (1 %)
    |        91
    |        91
    |        0 %
    |                       Lead (%) 
    |        75
    |        68
    |        10 %
    |        73
    |        3 %
    |        71
    |        73
    |        (3 %)
    |                                                        (1) 
    |        Bolivar is presented at 100% whereas the Company records 45% of revenues and expenses in its consolidated financial statements.
    |                     (2) 
    |        Silver  Equivalent Produced (ounces) have been calculated using prices of  $31.41/oz, $2,775.53/t and $2,085.90/t for silver, zinc and lead  respectively applied to the metal production divided by the silver price  as stated here.
    |                            Q2 2025 vs Q1 2025
   Silver equivalent production decreased by 24% due to a 12% decline in  tonnes processed; silver ounces declined by 28% and zinc by 19%. These  reductions stem from a mid-May water inflow that flooded the Pomabamba  South and Nané high grade areas, cutting access to planned stopes and  lowering average head grades (silver -20%, zinc -7%). A modest gain in  silver recoveries (+3%) only partially offset the impact of lower  grades, while zinc recoveries were essentially flat (-1%). San Lucas'  flexible sourcing model has mitigated a significant portion of  Bolivar's production shortfall, helping sustain overall throughput and  revenues until the affected areas are fully restored.
   Q2 2025 vs Q2 2024
   Silver equivalent production was 33% lower year over year driven by a  24% decline in material processed; silver output dropped by 29% and  zinc by 38%. The water inflow event described above limited mining  flexibility and access to higher grade stopes, which resulted in weaker  head grades (silver -8%, zinc -17%). Weaker head grades were marginally  offset by improved silver recoveries (+2%) while zinc recoveries  remained stable (-1%). San Lucas'  flexible sourcing model has mitigated a significant portion of the  Bolívar shortfall, helping sustain overall throughput and revenues until  operations in the affected areas are fully restored.
   Porco Mine 
                                 Porco Production Table (1)
    |         
    
   2025 Q2
    |        2025 Q1
    |        Change
   Q2 vs Q1
    |         
    
   2024 Q2
    |         
   Change
   Q2 vs Q2
    |        2025 YTD
    |        2024 YTD
    |        Change
   '25 YTD vs  '24 YTD
    |                     Material Processed (tonnes milled) 
    |        49,152
    |        47,501
    |        3 %
    |        51,307
    |        (4 %)
    |        96,653
    |        102,169
    |        (5 %)
    |                     Silver Equivalent Produced (ounces) (2) 
    |        360,841
    |        367,523
    |        (2 %)
    |        454,364
    |        (21 %)
    |        728,364
    |        921,264
    |        (21 %)
    |                     
  |        
  |        
  |        
  |        
  |        
  |        
  |        
  |        
  |                     Production
    |        
  |        
  |        
  |        
  |        
  |        
  |        
  |        
  |                       Silver (ounces)
    |        105,901
    |        120,537
    |        (12 %)
    |        151,258
    |        (30 %)
    |        226,438
    |        327,694
    |        (31 %)
    |                       Zinc (tonnes) 
    |        2,786
    |        2,674
    |        4 %
    |        3,276
    |        (15 %)
    |        5,460
    |        6,436
    |        (15 %)
    |                       Lead (tonnes)
    |        132
    |        161
    |        (18 %)
    |        205
    |        (36 %)
    |        293
    |        374
    |        (22 %)
    |                     
  |        
  |        
  |        
  |        
  |        
  |        
  |        
  |        
  |                     Average Grade
    |        
  |        
  |        
  |        
  |        
  |        
  |        
  |        
  |                       Silver (g/t)
    |        79
    |        98
    |        (20 %)
    |        105
    |        (25 %)
    |        88
    |        117
    |        (25 %)
    |                       Zinc (%)
    |        6.03
    |        5.99
    |        1 %
    |        6.76
    |        (11 %)
    |        6.01
    |        6.74
    |        (11 %)
    |                       Lead (%)
    |        0.41
    |        0.46
    |        (11 %)
    |        0.52
    |        (21 %)
    |        0.44
    |        0.49
    |        (11 %)
    |                     
  |        
  |        
  |        
  |        
  |        
  |        
  |        
  |        
  |                     Metal Recovery
    |        
  |        
  |        
  |        
  |        
  |        
  |        
  |        
  |                       Silver (%)
    |        85
    |        81
    |        6 %
    |        88
    |        (3 %)
    |        83
    |        85
    |        (3 %)
    |                       Zinc (%) 
    |        94
    |        94
    |        0 %
    |        94
    |        0 %
    |        94
    |        93
    |        1 %
    |                       Lead (%) 
    |        65
    |        73
    |        (11 %)
    |        77
    |        (15 %)
    |        69
    |        74
    |        (7 %)
    |                                                        (1)     
    |        Porco is presented at 100% whereas the Company records 45% of revenues and expenses in its consolidated financial statements.
    |                     (2)        
    |        Silver  Equivalent Produced (ounces) have been calculated using prices of  $31.41/oz, $2,775.53/t and $2,085.90/t for silver, zinc and lead  respectively applied to the metal production divided by the silver price  as stated here.
    |                            Q2 2025 vs Q1 2025
   Material processed increased by 3%, while silver equivalent  production remained roughly the same. Silver production declined 12% due  to a 20% decrease in head grades that was offset by a 6% improvement in  recoveries. Zinc production grew 4% with stable head grades (-1%) and  recoveries (nil %). The offsetting movement between silver grades and  recoveries limited the impact on overall silver equivalent ounces.
   Q2 2025 vs Q2 2024
   Material processed decreased by 4%, and silver equivalent production  declined by 21%. Silver output was down 30% due to a 25% drop in silver  head grades and a 3% decrease in recoveries. Zinc production fell 15%  due to lower head grades (-11%) and recoveries remained consistent.
   Caballo Blanco Group 
                                 Caballo Blanco Group Production Table (1)
    |         
    
   2025 Q2
    |        2025 Q1
    |        Change
   Q2 vs Q1
    |         
    
   2024 Q2
    |         
   Change  Q2 vs Q2
    |        2025 YTD
    |        2024 YTD
    |        Change
   '25 YTD vs  '24 YTD
    |                     Material Processed (tonnes milled) 
    |        57,773
    |        51,648
    |        12 %
    |        83,661
    |        (31 %)
    |        109,421
    |        156,123
    |        (30 %)
    |                     Silver Equivalent Produced (ounces) (2) 
    |        685,479
    |        659,208
    |        4 %
    |        832,229
    |        (18 %)
    |        1,344,687
    |        1,573,124
    |        (15 %)
    |                     
  |        
  |        
  |        
  |        
  |        
  |        
  |        
  |        
  |                     Production
    |        
  |        
  |        
  |        
  |        
  |        
  |        
  |        
  |                       Silver (ounces)
    |        294,786
    |        313,266
    |        (6 %)
    |        318,520
    |        (7 %)
    |        608,052
    |        603,330
    |        1 %
    |                       Zinc (tonnes) 
    |        3,974
    |        3,549
    |        12 %
    |        5,331
    |        (25 %)
    |        7,523
    |        10,034
    |        (25 %)
    |                       Lead (tonnes)
    |        595
    |        486
    |        22 %
    |        641
    |        (7 %)
    |        1,082
    |        1,252
    |        (14 %)
    |                     
  |        
  |        
  |        
  |        
  |        
  |        
  |        
  |        
  |                     Average Grade
    |        
  |        
  |        
  |        
  |        
  |        
  |        
  |        
  |                       Silver (g/t)
    |        168
    |        202
    |        (17 %)
    |        133
    |        27 %
    |        184
    |        134
    |        37 %
    |                       Zinc (%)
    |        7.32
    |        7.28
    |        0 %
    |        6.96
    |        5 %
    |        7.30
    |        7.00
    |        4 %
    |                       Lead (%)
    |        1.23
    |        1.15
    |        7 %
    |        1.04
    |        18 %
    |        1.19
    |        1.07
    |        11 %
    |                     
  |        
  |        
  |        
  |        
  |        
  |        
  |        
  |        
  |                     Metal Recovery
    |        
  |        
  |        
  |        
  |        
  |        
  |        
  |        
  |                       Silver (%)
    |        94
    |        93
    |        1 %
    |        89
    |        6 %
    |        94
    |        90
    |        5 %
    |                       Zinc (%) 
    |        94
    |        94
    |        0 %
    |        92
    |        3 %
    |        94
    |        92
    |        3 %
    |                       Lead (%) 
    |        84
    |        82
    |        2 %
    |        74
    |        13 %
    |        83
    |        75
    |        11 %
    |                                                        (2)  
    |        The Caballo Blanco Group consists of the Colquechaquita and Tres Amigos mines.
    |                     (1) 
    |        Silver  Equivalent Produced (ounces) have been calculated using prices of  $31.41/oz, $2,775.53/t and $2,085.90/t for silver, zinc and lead  respectively applied to the metal production divided by the silver price  as stated here.
    |                            Q2 2025 vs Q1 2025
   Material processed increased by 12%, while silver equivalent  production increased by 4%; the lower relative growth is due to reduced  silver head grades (-17%) that were partially offset by slightly higher  recoveries (1%). Silver production decreased 6% due to the grade  variance. Zinc production increased 12% with stable grades and  recoveries.
   Q2 2025 vs Q2 2024
   Results between quarters are not directly comparable because  prior-year figures included three mines, whereas current performance  reflects only Colquechaquita and Tres Amigos following the  reorganization in which Reserva mine production was 100% dedicated to  the San Lucas processing facility  starting in the second quarter of 2024. Material processed decreased by  31%, yet silver equivalent production declined by only 18%, indicating  improved efficiency. Silver output decreased by 7% as materially higher  silver head grades (+27%) and improved recoveries (+6%) were offset by  lower tonnes processed; this, combined with the positive trend in silver  prices, supported revenues. Zinc production decreased 25% due to lower  throughput, partly mitigated by modest improvements in zinc head grades  (+5%) and recoveries (+3%).
   San Lucas Group 
                                 San Lucas Group Production Table
    |         
    
   2025 Q2
    |        2025 Q1
    |        Change
   Q2 vs Q1
    |         
    
   2024 Q2
    |         
   Change  Q2 vs Q2
    |        2025 YTD
    |        2024 YTD
    |        Change
   '25 YTD vs  '24 YTD
    |                     Material Processed (tonnes milled) 
    |        94,973
    |        86,695
    |        10 %
    |        83,900
    |        13 %
    |        181,669
    |        153,121
    |        19 %
    |                     Silver Equivalent Produced (ounces) (1) 
    |        940,457
    |        858,514
    |        10 %
    |        1,026,334
    |        (8 %)
    |        1,798,971
    |        1,904,515
    |        (6 %)
    |                     
  |        
  |        
  |        
  |        
  |        
  |        
  |        
  |        
  |                     Production
    |        
  |        
  |        
  |        
  |        
  |        
  |        
  |        
  |                       Silver (ounces)
    |        319,634
    |        295,021
    |        8 %
    |        364,607
    |        (12 %)
    |        614,655
    |        659,605
    |        (7 %)
    |                       Zinc (tonnes) 
    |        6,643
    |        6,015
    |        10 %
    |        7,150
    |        (7 %)
    |        12,658
    |        13,429
    |        (6 %)
    |                       Lead (tonnes)
    |        509
    |        481
    |        6 %
    |        450
    |        13 %
    |        990
    |        877
    |        13 %
    |                     
  |        
  |        
  |        
  |        
  |        
  |        
  |        
  |        
  |                     Average Grade
    |        
  |        
  |        
  |        
  |        
  |        
  |        
  |        
  |                       Silver (g/t)
    |        124
    |        123
    |        1 %
    |        165
    |        (25 %)
    |        123
    |        162
    |        (24 %)
    |                       Zinc (%)
    |        7.81
    |        7.65
    |        2 %
    |        9.31
    |        (16 %)
    |        7.73
    |        9.58
    |        (19 %)
    |                       Lead (%)
    |        0.90
    |        0.84
    |        8 %
    |        0.86
    |        5 %
    |        0.87
    |        0.91
    |        (4 %)
    |                     
  |        
  |        
  |        
  |        
  |        
  |        
  |        
  |        
  |                     Metal Recovery
    |        
  |        
  |        
  |        
  |        
  |        
  |        
  |        
  |                       Silver (%)
    |        85
    |        86
    |        (2 %)
    |        82
    |        3 %
    |        85
    |        83
    |        3 %
    |                       Zinc (%) 
    |        90
    |        91
    |        (1 %)
    |        91
    |        (2 %)
    |        90
    |        92
    |        (2 %)
    |                       Lead (%) 
    |        59
    |        66
    |        (10 %)
    |        62
    |        (4 %)
    |        62
    |        63
    |        (1 %)
    |                                                        (1)
    |        Silver  Equivalent Produced (ounces) have been calculated using prices of  $31.41/oz, $2,775.53/t and $2,085.90/t for silver, zinc and lead  respectively applied to the metal production divided by the silver price  as stated here.
    |                            Q2 2025 vs Q1 2025
   The San Lucas ore sourcing and  trading business operates under a margin-based business model that  maintains contribution margins by aligning ore purchase costs with its  metallurgical content. Material processed increased by 10% and silver  equivalent production grew proportionally by 10%, reflecting stable  metallurgical performance. Silver output rose by 8% with stable head  grades (1%) and slightly lower recoveries (-2%). Zinc production  increased 10% due to marginal improvements in head grades (2%) and  stable recoveries (-1%). San Lucas also  fulfilled its strategic role by supporting overall Group mill  utilization and helping to offset part of the impact from the temporary  water flood event at Bolívar.
   Q2 2025 vs Q2 2024
   The San Lucas ore sourcing and  trading business operates under a margin-based business model that  maintains contribution margins by aligning ore purchase costs with its  metallurgical content. Material processed increased 13%; however, silver  equivalent production decreased 8% as lower silver head grades (-25%)  more than offset a 3% improvement in recoveries. Silver output declined  12% on the same grade trend. Zinc production decreased by 7% due to  lower head grades (-16%) and stable recoveries (-2%). Through flexible  sourcing, San Lucas continued to preserve margins and provided strategic support to mitigate the temporary disruption at Bolivar during the period.
   Zimapan Mine 
                                  
   Zimapan Production Table
    |         
    
   2025 Q2
    |        2025 Q1
    |        Change
   Q2 vs Q1
    |         
    
   2024 Q2
    |         
   Change  Q2 vs Q2
    |        2025 YTD
    |        2024 YTD
    |        Change
   '25 YTD vs  '24 YTD
    |                     Material Processed (tonnes milled) 
    |        224,162
    |        223,573
    |        0 %
    |        209,735
    |        7 %
    |        447,735
    |        415,139
    |        8 %
    |                     Silver Equivalent Produced (ounces) (1) 
    |        958,761
    |        1,016,585
    |        (6 %)
    |        949,233
    |        1 %
    |        1,975,347
    |        1,840,289
    |        7 %
    |                     
  |        
  |        
  |        
  |        
  |        
  |        
  |        
  |        
  |                     Production
    |        
  |        
  |        
  |        
  |        
  |        
  |        
  |        
  |                       Silver (ounces) 
    |        398,293
    |        440,199
    |        (10 %)
    |        403,309
    |        (3 %)
    |        838,492
    |        809,259
    |        4 %
    |                       Zinc (tonnes) 
    |        4,521
    |        4,498
    |        1 %
    |        4,127
    |        10 %
    |        9,019
    |        7,769
    |        16 %
    |                       Lead (tonnes) 
    |        1,354
    |        1,389
    |        (3 %)
    |        1,312
    |        3 %
    |        2,744
    |        2,663
    |        3 %
    |                       Copper (tonnes) 
    |        229
    |        279
    |        (18 %)
    |        284
    |        (19 %)
    |        507
    |        539
    |        (6 %)
    |                     
  |        
  |        
  |        
  |        
  |        
  |        
  |        
  |        
  |                     Average Grade
    |        
  |        
  |        
  |        
  |        
  |        
  |        
  |        
  |                       Silver (g/t) 
    |        77
    |        80
    |        (3 %)
    |        80
    |        (3 %)
    |        79
    |        81
    |        (3 %)
    |                       Zinc (%)
    |        2.62
    |        2.56
    |        2 %
    |        2.46
    |        7 %
    |        2.59
    |        2.38
    |        9 %
    |                       Lead (%)
    |        0.80
    |        0.72
    |        11 %
    |        0.73
    |        10 %
    |        0.76
    |        0.78
    |        (3 %)
    |                       Copper (%)
    |        0.22
    |        0.26
    |        (14 %)
    |        0.30
    |        (25 %)
    |        0.24
    |        0.29
    |        (18 %)
    |                     
  |        
  |        
  |        
  |        
  |        
  |        
  |        
  |        
  |                     Metal Recovery
    |        
  |        
  |        
  |        
  |        
  |        
  |        
  |        
  |                       Silver (%) 
    |        71
    |        77
    |        (7 %)
    |        76
    |        (6 %)
    |        74
    |        75
    |        (1 %)
    |                       Zinc (%) 
    |        77
    |        79
    |        (2 %)
    |        80
    |        (4 %)
    |        78
    |        79
    |        (1 %)
    |                       Lead (%) 
    |        76
    |        86
    |        (12 %)
    |        86
    |        (12 %)
    |        81
    |        83
    |        (2 %)
    |                       Copper (%) 
    |        45
    |        48
    |        (5 %)
    |        45
    |        0 %
    |        47
    |        44
    |        6 %
    |                                                        (1) 
    |        Silver  Equivalent Produced (ounces) have been calculated using prices of  $31.41/oz, $2,775.53/t, $,2085.90/t and $9,762.69/t for silver, zinc,  lead and copper respectively applied to the metal production divided by  the silver price as stated here. 
    |                            Q2 2025 vs Q1 2025
   Throughput was stable (nil%) while silver equivalent production  decreased 6%. Silver output fell 10% due to a 7% drop in recoveries and  slightly lower head grades (-3%). Zinc production was stable (+1%) with  marginally higher head grades (+2%) offset by a slight decrease in  recoveries (-2%).
   Q2 2025 vs Q2 2024
   Material processed increased by 7%, and silver equivalent production  improved by 1%, as a higher zinc contribution offset slightly lower  silver production. Silver production decreased 3% due to modestly lower  head grades (-3%) and a decrease in recoveries (-6%). Zinc production  increased by 10%, supported by a 7% rise in head grades.
   Qualified Person 
   Garth Kirkham, P.Geo., an independent  consultant to the Company, is a qualified person under NI 43-101 and has  approved the scientific and technical information contained within this  news release.
   About Santacruz Silver Mining Ltd. 
   Santacruz Silver is engaged in the operation, acquisition, exploration, and development of mineral properties across Latin America. In Bolivia,  the Company operates the Bolivar, Porco, and Caballo Blanco mining  complexes, with Caballo Blanco comprising the Tres Amigos and  Colquechaquita mines. The Reserva mine, whose production is provided to  the San Lucas ore sourcing and trading business, is also located in Bolivia. Additionally, the Company oversees the Soracaya exploration project. In Mexico, Santacruz operates the Zimapán mine. 
   'signed' Arturo Préstamo Elizondo, Executive Chairman and CEO
   Neither the TSX Venture Exchange nor its Regulation Services  Provider (as that term is defined in the policies of the TSX Venture  Exchange) accepts responsibility for the adequacy or accuracy of this  release.
   Forward Looking Information 
   This news release includes certain statements and information that  may constitute forward-looking information within the meaning of  applicable Canadian securities laws. Forward-looking statements relate  to future events or future performance and reflect the expectations or  beliefs of management of the Company regarding future events. Generally,  forward-looking statements and information can be identified by the use  of forward-looking terminology such as "intends", "expects" or  "anticipates", or variations of such words and phrases or statements  that certain actions, events or results "may", "could", "should",  "would" or will "potentially" or "likely" occur. This information and  these statements, referred to herein as "forward-looking statements",  are not historical facts, are made as of the date of this news release  and include without limitation, cost reduction and enhanced  metallurgical recovery (particularly of silver) in 2025.
   These forward-looking statements involve numerous risks and  uncertainties and actual results might differ materially from results  suggested in any forward-looking statements. These risks and  uncertainties include, among other things, risks related to changes in  general economic, business and political conditions, including changes  in the financial markets, changes in applicable laws, and compliance  with extensive government regulation, as well as those risk factors  discussed or referred to in the Company's disclosure documents filed  with the securities regulatory authorities in certain provinces of Canada and available at  www.sedarplus.ca.
   In making the forward-looking statements in this news release, the  Company has applied several material assumptions, including without  limitation, the assumption that the Company's capital investments will  result in reduced costs and enhanced metallurgical recovery.
   There can be no assurance that any forward-looking information  will prove to be accurate, as actual results and future events could  differ materially from those anticipated in such statements.  Accordingly, the reader should not place any undue reliance on  forward-looking information or statements. The Company undertakes no  obligation to update forward-looking information or statements, other  than as required by applicable law.
   SOURCE Santacruz Silver Mining Ltd.
    For further information please contact: Arturo Préstamo, Santacruz Silver Mining Ltd., Email: info@santacruzsilver.com, Telephone: +52 81 83 785707; Andrés Bedregal, Santacruz Silver Mining Ltd., Email: info@santacruzsilver.com, Telephone: +591 22444849
                               |