SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Pastimes : All Things Weather and Mother Nature

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: LoneClone who wrote (827)7/30/2025 2:34:13 PM
From: Thomas A Watson2 Recommendations

Recommended By
longz
miraje

  Read Replies (1) of 922
 
Based on the total absence of objective data showing any relationship between CO2 past and present having any effect on whatever global climate is impacted by changes of 1.5 parts in 10,000 I am still trying to figuure out what climate chicken little's think the scientific method is.

I wonder at what chicken little's consider expedience. Even the lastes IPCC science reports conclude there has been no statistical evidence of worse or more extreme weather from the 1.5 parts in 10,000 recent increase. Same of fires and annual land ares burned.

But there is universal 100% agreement the the greening of the earth by an area larger than CONUS was caused by CO2, the fertilizer of plants.

OH THE HORROR, crop yields have increased by 30% and need less water. If one can visualize osmosis one knows why this is true.

Now are humans 100% the cause of creating urban heat islands that break heat records as they swallow suburban and the beyond green. No doubt. But there is no evidence that any increase in CO2 they cause does anything but increase more Human and animal and plant survivable real estate.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext