If NETZ had better financials that DCLK, the private investment
community would know it. Companies dont operate in a vaccuum.
The only thing regarding financials that NETZ has _ever_ posted
is that if you count the revenues that softbank interactive
had LAST year, then "they" had more revenues than doubleclick
in that time period. That is all. They could have also
picked up 50 million in debt, they could also be planning
a huge reverse split, they could also have lost all their
existing softbank contracts.
Instead of any hint at financials, all we get are repeated
press releases denying a buyout rumor and mentioning their
name along with doubleclick at every possible chance.
I feel pity for you guys. For the ones who manage to dump
their shares at a profit, good for you. But to the ones
who end up holding the bag when the financials DO come out,
I don't envy you.
Finally, if NETZ had better financials than DoubleClick,
why were they unable to get any major brokerage to take
them public? Why did they have to go the reverse shell
merger route onto the penny OTC boards? Answer that one?
If I were a big underwriter (who, by the way, are probably
the only ones outside of netz who do know the financials)
I would take NETZ public in a second if they actually
had better numbers than DoubleClick. But they havnt.
Why? The answer is- their REAL numbers, when they come
out, are going to disappoint or even frighten away
everyone. |
