Qualcomm Moderated Thread - please read rules before posting Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Qualcomm Moderated Thread - please read rules before posting

QCOM 174.76

+0.3%

3:59 PM EST

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Bill Wolf who wrote (195201)	8/12/2025 10:05:16 AM
From: sbfm	3 Recommendations Recommended By Art Bechhoefer kech QCOM_HYPE_TRAIN Read Replies (1) of 197016

I view articles like this click bait, designed to enrage for clicks. The author must explain the granular legislative path to accomplish the goal. Explain how 60 senators would vote for the bill. Otherwise, the click bait is based upon absurd trial balloons. Now, the author is satisfied - clicks; the proponent is satisfied - keeps the "idea" in view. But, until a viable path to a statute is sketched, it's all pompous hot air. I can also hypothesize that the NVIDIA and AMD "deal" was also offered to INTC. INTC said "no" and the result was an personal, brutal, public attack on a US citizen. Of course, yesterday, that same citizen was fed a carrot. As each line is crossed, more and more companies will face the same quandary. Every US based company - tech, agriculture, services - will be a target. Q is on that list. I think its legal because a company (AMD and NVIDIA now) can freely and voluntarily enter into such contracts; there's no EO or law mandating the deal. The only opposition can come from shareholder pushback.

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next