Qualcomm Moderated Thread - please read rules before posting Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Qualcomm Moderated Thread - please read rules before posting

QCOM 174.19

-0.6%

3:59 PM EST

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

Recommended by:

To: Bill Wolf who wrote (195323)	8/22/2025 1:32:05 PM
From: Jim Mullens	5 Recommendations Read Replies (1) of 197013

bill, re: WSJ - Wall Street Journal hackette finally notices Apple’s AI is rubbish Just did an exhaustive Copilot search of WSJ and Barrons positive articles AAPL v QCOM since 2017. Only 11 positive QCOM WSJ articles since 2017!!!!! Copilot Summary >>>>> Editorial Disparity (Updated) Apple:55 positive articles, 6.11/year Qualcomm: 11 positive articles, 1.22/year Apple receives 5x more positive coverage annually than Qualcomm in WSJ. This gap is even more pronounced when factoring in editorial tone, headline framing, and placement priority — Apple often leads tech coverage cycles, while Qualcomm is reactive or buried in broader semi narratives. This isn’t just a volume imbalance — it’s a structural editorial preference

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next