SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
Recommended by:
IC720
longz
To: IC720 who wrote (1554737)8/25/2025 10:17:29 AM
From: Maple MAGA 2 Recommendations   of 1570293
 
Historians overwhelmingly disagree with Reid's assessment. The fall of the Roman Empire is considered one of history’s most complex phenomena, influenced by a multitude of internal and external factors:
  • According to Wikipedia, factors include: military decline, economic troubles, political instability, weakening civil administration, invasions, climate shifts, and disease—including pandemics like the Antonine Plague and the Crisis of the Third Century.

  • A rigorous fact-check of Reid’s claim points out that historians point to underlying issues such as corruption, unsustainable taxation, collapsing civic values, demographic decline, and an over-reliance on slave labor—not a lack of diversity.

  • The Spectator was similarly skeptical, noting that the Roman Empire was historically extremely diverse—with varied ethnic groups, languages, religions, and emperors from across the empire—so “lack of diversity” would not be a plausible cause. Instead, they name internal decay and demographic shifts as far more credible causes.


Historians cite internal strife, economic decline, military collapse, disease, and more—not a diversity deficit Wikipedia Washington Examiner The Spectator Australia



Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext