Qualcomm Moderated Thread - please read rules before posting Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Qualcomm Moderated Thread - please read rules before posting

QCOM 175.25

+0.6%

Dec 19 9:30 AM EST

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

Recommended by:

Lance Bredvold

Ruffian

sbfm

To: sbfm who wrote (195387)	8/25/2025 4:05:48 PM
From: cold_snowman	3 Recommendations Read Replies (1) of 197001

After my MSEE in the early '90 I was looking for a PhD program. One of the programs was about vehicle to infrastructure communication. The professor touted it as the next big thing in automotive. I didn't go for it but ever since I'm following the discussion. And that's it, a discussion with the exception of paying tolls. It's a technology that has a lot of difficulties to get the critical mass for lift off. Why would a car maker spend serious money to add this technology to the car. There is no infrastructure or other cars to talk to. Government entities are not spending money because there are no cars to talk to So it's a chicken and egg problem. For it to make significant commercial progress stars and planets have to align. I don't see how this can be any meaningful contributor to Qualcomm's revenues anytime soon

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next