Pacific Rim Mining V.PFG Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Pacific Rim Mining V.PFG

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Bill Jackson who wrote (8791)	2/25/1998 2:29:00 AM
From: Don craig	Read Replies (2) of 14627

Bill: The 3 Million ounce bottom line for Barrick is discussed constantly, and I get the feeling lately that people do not believe that figure can be reached on the Diablillos anymore. I think the fact that Silver has become such a hot topic lately and Gold has not, has lead people to believe that there might not be an economical Gold deposit. Well, when most of us got involve with PFG in the begining, I think it was based on the potential for a Gold mine on the Diablillos, and did not have a whole lot to do with Silver. Don't get me wrong I am not trying to say that the Silver is not important, I'm just saying lets not forget that we may still have a substantial amount of Gold here. Just my thoughts Bill. Good Luck Don

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next