| | | i used to try to research something on the internet to find alternate ideas and solutions and it was painstaking going to many web sites, finding relevant articles, scanning them for content, tabluating it all. then I spend alot of time evaluating the source for technical correctness.
Now I can ask 20 questions a day with a very complex root and get back summaries, links, supporting articles, alternate thoughts on the actual question (like you should be asking this instead of that), and quite alot of versatile info.
One feature I especially like is the ability to read the response and ask a contextual question to follow and it remembers the original question, all teh facts, and then dives deeper into the final topic.
in most cases I am not concerned about bias or politics, but more about information on a technical basis.
For instance I asked "why is the emmc flash market having problems and what can we do to alternate source them?" got alot of ideas that used to take me a day or two to find answers. I got what I needed in 30 seconds.
if apple does not improve the ai, they are completely out of the race, going the way of Nokia with yesterdays flashy thin phone,
(one note - for the lawyers who filed based upon AI, they were just lazy. If they used AI to find all the articles and then READ them and carefully cited them, they probably would not have gotten into so much trouble. But they went and asked AI to write the legal brief and that is where they got really messed up. head of DOJ not excluded) |
|
