| | | UK: Trans police volunteer found guilty of raping and sexually assaulting child
Aug 29, 2025 11:00 am
By Christine Douglass-Williams
6 Comments
On the heels of the news regarding the heinous acts of Minneapolis trans shooter Robin Westman comes another report of child victimization in the UK. This one, by a police trans volunteer.
In a previous Jihad Watch article regarding JK Rowling’s warning about the trans movement, I gave some examples of how the trans movement has become dangerous: the rape of women by men identifying as women; the trans takeover of female sports; the potential physical harm to females in prisons and to youngsters in schools; the sexualization of small children during what should be innocent reading and learning time, not drag shows; vulgar exhibitionism at pools in full view of young girls; and increasing incidents of outright weirdness that threaten women to an extent never previously thought possible, such as the male who identifies as a woman with a birthing fetish, who has now been arrested for fraud and sex assaults.
And there are too many proven opportunities for a man “identifying” as a woman to be a threat to women and kids.
 “Trans police volunteer found guilty of raping and sexually assaulting child,” by George Bunn, GB News, August 28, 2025:
A transgender volunteer Metropolitan Police officer has been found guilty of raping and sexually assaulting a child.
Gwyn Samuels made no expression as the verdicts were read out but sobbed with his head in his hands after the foreman finished speaking.
The 27-year-old was born as a man named James Bubb.
Bubb, of High Street, Chesham, Buckinghamshire, is currently suspended from the force.
THAMES VALLEY POLICE
Jurors were told Bubb was violent towards the girl when he raped and sexually abused her in her early teens, with the victim telling police he choked and punched her.
The 27-year-old defendant was also found guilty of raping a woman he met online while posing as a 16-year-old girl.
On Thursday, in relation to one complainant, Bubb was found guilty of one count of raping a child under 13, one count of sexual activity with a child, one count of assault of a child under 13 by penetration, and one count of assault by penetration.
He was found not guilty of one count of rape and one count of sexual activity with a child in relation to that complainant, and found guilty of one count of rape against another complainant…. |
|