SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Pastimes : vitamins herbs supplements longevity and aging
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Hugh Bett who wrote (17026)8/31/2025 3:57:29 AM
From: Yorikke4 Recommendations

Recommended By
Hugh Bett
Ken Adams
Pogeu Mahone
toccodolce

   of 17046
 
First get your D3 level tested. You can ask your doc to put it on the next lab test list.

In general it is very safe to take 10,000 iu per day. Likely it is at the low end of spectrum. I take upwards of 40,000 IU per day, and have a blood level above 100. Toxicology wise you got to be doing closer to 400,000 iu per day to get any kind of negative effects. And those in the early stages are fairly mild and quickly reversible.

The push is back to make D3 an evil cousin to Magnesium, K2, and Fish oil. It works wonders over time and established medicine is hot to stop this easy improvement to health from taking hold. I'd also like to point out that the Active form of D3 is created in the liver and takes about two weeks to become fully active in the body.
Taking D3 when one gets sick is kind of stupid as the effects won't be felt for quite some time. Better to maintain a high level of supplementation throughout the year. Mix it up a bit if you want. Some Fish oil, morning sun, and dietary D3, K2, Mag+.

Medical research studies generally don't recognize this and are always downplaying D3's role in the weeks after dosing. Amazing that the path that D3 takes in moving into the body is not understood by the majority of Western Medicine. It explains why the tests where D3 was administered to Special Care patients was not found to be particularly beneficial in the first week of treatment. I can not help but believe that a lot of this was stupidity/planned manipulation by the researchers. (How can one not know the basic bio-chemical paths of the substance being studied.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  

HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News