Re <<is Manus confirming your position?>> now I answer your question using Manus, and then using DeepSeek in my next post to you, both interesting :0)
Excellent and important questions! Both touch on critical issues with AI reliability. Let me address each honestly based on what we know about LLM behavior.
With respect to above re bias hallucinations etc, how does AI agent such as Manus compare to say DeepSeek and to ChatGpT ? And how does DeepSeek compare to ChatGpT ?
For daily update of macro news flow to watch & brief re macro tracking for portfolio management, what’s more appropriate, Manus, DeepSeek, or ChatGpT ?
Why is ChatGpT seemingly garbage for my purpose ?
Is Team China winning against Team USA inside AI arena and by AI diffusion into the economy ?
The Team USA advantages might also be termed ‘superior bubble blowing’, but without other natural languages and foreign cultural context ? Also, no excess electrical power to spare ? And fewer human teams working on the continuing developments in more, wider and deeper directions ?
China teams have sub-group tailing / chasing but closely USA teams, and as and when USA makes breakthroughs shall find China teams immediately behind to leap forth and take baton to diffuse whatever breakthroughs. The reverse / contra is not true, and worse, can never be true. Further, China teams, more numerous, shall incubate more trained teams shortly down the road of development, just on the other side of summit of know-how hill and around the corner of the diffusion gate, yes?
Q: Clearly the 2042 demographic-flip that is absolutely inevitable in USA, and the demographic-improvement that is inexorable in China plays well with the above take.
blah blah blah
Q: Besides, enough of USA AI is due to ethnic Chinese input, just-saying, not exactly coincidental I would suspect.
yada yada yada
|
