2026 TeoTwawKi ... 2032 Darkest Interregnum Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : 2026 TeoTwawKi ... 2032 Darkest Interregnum

GLD 368.29

+0.6%

4:00 PM EST

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Box-By-The-Riviera™ who wrote (216385)	9/7/2025 2:31:11 AM
From: TobagoJack	Read Replies (1) of 217567

would note that N Korea signing mutual defense with Russia and action on it in the Kursk direction is about as <<macro>> as macro gets, as far as Nato / USA / EU capabilities / capacities challenged to the max concerned spend spend spend going bankrupt UK / France etc etc you know, WWIII de facto be macro or macro-esque and by actioning undertaking, N Korea, cannot even get liquid fuel rocketry to work and minus pairing nuke all of a sudden got solid fuel rocketry en.wikipedia.org plus pairing nukes likely also macro FYI, the TEL (transporter / erector / launcher) for N Korea is from China, as China also, coincidentally, has mutual defense with N Korea So, we best conclude Team Trump #1 doing the Seal thing likely unhelpful or Russia Topol-M just coincidentally also solid fuel 3-stages en.wikipedia.org

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next