SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : ajtj's Post-Lobotomy Market Charts and Thoughts
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: ajtj99 who wrote (95014)9/16/2025 12:52:09 AM
From: Sun Tzu1 Recommendation

Recommended By
ajtj99

   of 97526
 
The constitution never said "firearms"; it says "arms".

So you could argue that means arms available to most people back then (swords and single shot firearms).

Or you could argue that tanks and jet fighters are allowed too.

If you go to some fringe gun activists, they will argue that the citizens should be as armed as the federal government to be able to resist and overthrow the government.

However, this is a misinterpretation of the constitution. The law was not geared towards the US government, but that of Britain.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  

HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News