SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Bonefish who wrote (1559348)9/16/2025 1:36:53 PM
From: locogringo2 Recommendations

Recommended By
Bonefish
longz

  Read Replies (4) of 1570893
 
The haters are protected by the 1st Amendment...but their hate speech is NOT immune to the consequences of such HATE speech.

If an employer doesn't want to hear it, he/she doesn't have to.

If parents don't want their children to hear it or see it, they don't have to.

If stockholders decide hate speech hurts their bottom line, they don't have to accept it.

There are many other examples.

There are plenty of lawyers to take the cases of hate speech possibly leading to further harm of an individual or class of individuals. Jail them if convicted or sue them for every penny. (like Dershowitz wants Trump to do to Rosie O'Donnell)

Nobody is above the law...nor beneath it. Nobody deserves to be assassinated for their beliefs.

It's actually pretty simple...at least to one side.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  

HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News