SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : World Outlook
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Qone0 who wrote (47959)9/24/2025 12:49:12 PM
From: Les H  Read Replies (1) of 48889
 
They were given a limited amount of information from the coroner. Everything else is conjecture based on the absence of information or denials. He didn't say that he asked the coroner directly about the condition of the bullet. It's not very likely that he would freely volunteer such information. There's a difference between someone telling you something and you assuming the opposite when he doesn't tell you something you want. You can't assume the bullet is intact because he didn't say it was fragmented. You can't assume the bullet retained its shape because he didn't say it was deformed. Why would an official or someone with the inside knowledge tell you those kinds of details when you're SUPPOSED TO BE IN GRIEF instead of pumping out unfounded rumors. The only real facts known are that the medical examiner asked the widow not to view the body and that they had found the bullet inside the body.

The coroner's report will probably be out in several weeks. I would let it go.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  

HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News