SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Canadian Political Free-for-All

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: gg cox who wrote (36522)9/27/2025 11:24:20 AM
From: Kitskid1 Recommendation

Recommended By
gg cox

  Read Replies (1) of 37055
 
I defer to chatgpt for an answer.

Kitskid.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Good question. A kakistocracy means “government by the worst, least qualified, or most unscrupulous citizens.” When applied to democracies, it’s not usually a formal label that political scientists assign, but rather a critique: democracies can slide into kakistocracy if voters, institutions, or parties elevate unqualified or corrupt leaders.

Examples sometimes called “kakistocratic democracies” (by critics, journalists, or scholars):
  • Philippines under Rodrigo Duterte (2016–2022): Critics argued his extrajudicial killings, disregard for human rights, and populist tactics degraded democratic institutions.

  • Brazil under Jair Bolsonaro (2019–2022): His anti-science policies during COVID-19, attacks on democratic norms, and environmental destruction led some academics to use the “kakistocracy” label.

  • United States during Donald Trump’s presidency (2017–2021): Commentators (including conservative voices like David Frum and liberal outlets like The Atlantic) described the administration as a kakistocracy due to high turnover, corruption charges, and controversial appointments.

  • Zimbabwe under Robert Mugabe (after it adopted nominal democratic processes): Elections existed but were manipulated, and governance was often described as kleptocratic and kakistocratic.

Who’s to blame?
  • Voters: In democracies, electorates sometimes support leaders who appeal to fears, emotions, or simple promises rather than competence or integrity.

  • Political parties: Weak candidate vetting, corruption, or prioritizing loyalty over skill can elevate unfit leaders.

  • Institutions: If courts, legislatures, or watchdog agencies are too weak (or undermined), they fail to check abuse of power.

  • Elites & media: Sometimes they enable or normalize poor governance by ignoring corruption or amplifying demagoguery.

?? In short: blame is diffuse—citizens, institutions, and elites all share responsibility when a democracy drifts into kakistocracy.

Would you like me to pull recent (2023–2025) scholarly or journalistic references to democracies currently being called “kakistocracies”? That way I can give you the freshest real-world examples.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext