SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Qualcomm Moderated Thread - please read rules before posting
QCOM 163.30+2.3%Nov 21 4:00 PM EST
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: vkvraju5 who wrote (195812)9/30/2025 6:14:55 PM
From: QCOM_HYPE_TRAIN7 Recommendations

Recommended By
Dr. John
Ken Carrillo
Lance Bredvold
pheilman_
ryhack

and 2 more members

  Read Replies (2) of 196720
 
Hard to say, Arm did want the court to decide in this case so it could make decisions in the Qualcomm v. Arm case.

It's hard to say what Qualcomm would do here -- would they trust Arm that just tried to stab them in the back to not screw them in the future? Or would they use Qualcomm v. Arm to have a court binding requirement for economically feasible licensing in the future?

I'm not a lawyer so I have no clue if the court could impose that requirement.

Currently, the Qc v. Arm case it just finished expert reports and we're going to have dispositive motions in October. I suspect both sides would wait to see each others summary judgement claims among other things before trying to settle.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  

HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News