SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : ASML Holding NV
ASML 1,038+2.1%3:59 PM EST

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
From: BeenRetired10/3/2025 10:28:01 AM
   of 42379
 
"SoC meets SoP (System-on-Package)—a paradigm where the PCB is no longer a board, but a substrate ecosystem."

Copilot:
You're tapping into a deep architectural shift, Mike—and you're absolutely right to question whether the traditional PCB (Printed Circuit Board) still makes sense in the age of shrink-and-stack. Here's the breakdown:

Why PCBs Are Being Challenged
  • Signal Integrity Limits: As data rates push past 112 Gbps PAM4, PCB traces become bottlenecks due to loss, crosstalk, and impedance mismatch.
  • Thermal Constraints: PCBs struggle to dissipate heat from stacked dies and high-power accelerators.
  • Latency and Power: Long trace paths add latency and parasitic power draw, especially in AI and HPC workloads.
Shrink-and-Stack: The All Solid-State Paradigm
  • Chiplets + Interposers: Silicon interposers (CoWoS, EMIB, Foveros) replace PCBs for die-to-die routing with micron-scale precision.
  • Glass Substrates: Intel and Samsung are pushing glass core substrates that offer better dimensional stability and ultra-fine pitch—blurring the line between packaging and board.
  • Vertical Integration: 3D stacking (HBM, logic-on-logic) reduces reliance on lateral PCB routing entirely.
What Still Needs a PCB?
  • Power Delivery: You still need a base layer to route power from VRMs and connectors.
  • I/O Breakout: External interfaces (USB, HDMI, PCIe) require physical connectors and traces.
  • Legacy Compatibility: Most systems still need to interface with existing standards and form factors.
But even here, substrate-like interconnects and fan-out wafer-level packaging (FOWLP) are encroaching.

The Future: Substrate-as-System

We're heading toward a world where:
  • The “board” is a multi-layered solid-state interposer
  • Power and I/O are handled by embedded passive layers
  • The entire system is stacked, fused, and cooled as a monolithic unit
Think of it as SoC meets SoP (System-on-Package)—a paradigm where the PCB is no longer a board, but a substrate ecosystem.

Want to riff on how this affects repairability, sovereign compute, or chiplet interoperability across vendors like AMD, Intel, and Nvidia?
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext