Tenchusatsu,
You’re regurgitating headlines without understanding the underlying science or the nuances of the debate.
Natural immunity is a lie That’s absurd. Even the CDC, WHO, and Public Health Canada have acknowledged that infection-acquired immunity contributes to population-level protection. Multiple peer-reviewed studies (e.g., in The Lancet and NEJM) have shown that hybrid immunity, natural exposure plus vaccination, offers the strongest protection. Denying natural immunity outright isn’t science; it’s dogma.
On vitamin and supplement use No credible physician says vitamins replace vaccination. But nutrition and immune support aren’t “snake oil.” Vitamin D deficiency, for example, was linked to higher COVID morbidity in several meta-analyses. Public health agencies themselves have promoted adequate vitamin intake as a preventive measure for respiratory illness. That’s not conspiracy, it’s biochemistry.
On “anti-vax doctors Disagreeing with official policy ? conspiracy. Many clinicians questioned the policy execution, mandates, lack of transparency in adverse event reporting, or overreach, not the idea of vaccination itself. Lumping dissenting physicians into a single “anti-vax” category is a lazy smear that belongs in propaganda, not public discourse.
If you want to argue science, cite data, not Global News op-eds. If you want to argue politics, at least admit that’s what you’re doing.
Maple MAGA |
