SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : Young and Older Folk Portfolio

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
From: QTI on SI10/15/2025 3:21:37 PM
8 Recommendations

Recommended By
chowder
Chowderfan
Lucia
Markbn
misscbd

and 3 more members

  Read Replies (1) of 22480
 
Generated chatter summary from today to help me grasp/follow some conversations here. Posting here, since it only takes a click or two and some of you may find it useful in following the conversations:

THE BIG THEMES (10/15/2025 Discussion Summary)

1. The KMB Debate: Dividend Dependability vs. Performance Fatigue
  • mykesc2020 kicked off the thread by selling Kimberly-Clark (KMB) due to sluggish dividend growth and underperformance.

    • His goal: replace KMB with a stock yielding 5%+ and 5%+ dividend growth for the past 3 years.

    • Also eyeing BMY as a potential next sell for similar reasons.

  • Dividendretire2 took the opposite stance:

    • Added to KMB, citing a 4.2% yield and strong dividend safety from Simply Safe Dividends (SSD).

    • Views KMB as a low-risk income anchor, especially as a small 2% allocation.

  • Chowder’s take (Post 21299):

    • Keeps KMB in his personal portfolio, calling it “great yield for a defensive holding.”

    • Says KMB is probably a sell for most, but not for him — because of simplicity for his wife after he’s gone.

    • Prioritizes familiarity and low management complexity over chasing higher returns.

    Key Insight:
    Chowder’s KMB rationale isn’t about market performance — it’s about legacy planning and behavioral simplicity. He’s applying a Peter Lynch “invest in what you know” principle not for alpha, but for continuity and peace of mind.

2. The “5-and-5” Search: Income + Growth Balance
  • mykesc2020’s goal: Find a stock yielding 5% with 5% annual dividend growth — actual, not averaged.

    • Keowee’s suggestion: MO and ConAgra (CAG).

    • mykesc2020: Already owns MO (6.4% yield, but growth <5%), open to exploring CAG.

    Key Theme:
    The “5-and-5” club — investors balancing current yield and sustainable dividend compounding — continues to define the income-growth sweet spot for many on the thread.

3. CEF (Closed-End Fund) Premiums & Discipline
  • jritz0 (Post 21290) sounded an alarm on CEF premiums, using AGD and AOD as case studies:

    • AGD went from a 19% premium to a 3.5% discount in a week, wiping out 22% of capital for those ignoring valuation.

    • Warns that CEF pricing discipline is essential — premiums/discounts do matter.

    • He still bought a little AGD, calling it a volatility play with arbitrage potential.

  • Chowder (Post 21307) immediately responded:

    • Despite jritz0’s warning, he added to AOD earlier and took a larger position in AGD today — using the selloff as a value entry point.

    • Thanks jritz0 for the “heads-up” from Albo’s article — showing he respects tactical input but acts opportunistically.

    Key Contrast:

    • jritz0 = Tactical / disciplined trader who times CEFs based on valuation spreads.

    • Chowder = Opportunistic allocator who uses CEF dips to build income-producing positions in long-term, diversified portfolios.

4. Funds vs. Familiarity: A Philosophical Divide This exchange between jritz0 and Chowder reveals two distinct portfolio management philosophies:














5. Other Supporting Notes
  • GLAD (BDC) – mykesc2020 reports a 9% dividend cut, but remains calm and plans to reassess post-quarter.

  • weathersystems trimmed speculative AI positions (OKLO, QBTS, IONQ, etc.) — taking profits, reducing risk.

  • Mili21 is frustrated with ABT and plans to sell — consistent with the theme of “high-quality fatigue” in this thread.

  • QTI is trimming SCHD for GLD and DGRO — showing a trend toward hard assets and total-return dividend ETFs.

  • jritz0 also reinforces currency-debasement hedging via EDGH (hard assets ETF).

  • ChillyWillie continues trading gold/silver ratio swings, while jritz0 prefers long-term accumulation of both.

KEY TAKEAWAYS

1. Chowder’s Priority: Durable, Understandable Income
  • Keeps KMB despite lagging growth for legacy simplicity.

  • Adds AOD/AGD when premiums collapse — seizes opportunity, but always for income reinforcement.

  • Willing to double down on familiar, safe, income-paying companies that a non-investing spouse could maintain.

2. jritz0’s Discipline: Valuation, Protection, and Hard Assets
  • Warns others that premium/discount swings can crush capital in CEFs.

  • Prefers structured income funds (like KHPI, QQQH, EDGH) over individual dividend stocks.

  • Views silver and hard-asset ETFs as hedges against currency debasement — showing a macro-protective mindset.

  • Doesn’t chase simplicity — prioritizes mechanical efficiency and risk mitigation.

3. Broader Forum Mood
  • Several posters (mykesc2020, Mili21, QTI) are rotating out of traditional dividend stalwarts (KMB, BMY, ABT, SCHD).

  • Growing attention to alternative income sources: BDCs, CEFs, hard-asset ETFs.

  • There’s a subtle pivot from “steady dividend growers” ? toward “income resilience + macro hedges.”

Final Synthesis This was a pivotal conversation where:

  • Chowder reaffirmed his income legacy strategy — focusing on clarity, safety, and behavioral continuity.

  • jritz0 represented the tactician’s view — focused on valuation discipline, income efficiency, and macro hedging.

  • The community is collectively reassessing traditional dividend reliability (like KMB, ABT, BMY) in favor of fund structures and real-asset exposure.

Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext