SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : Items affecting stock market picks

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
From: russet10/19/2025 1:55:45 AM
1 Recommendation

Recommended By
longz

   of 8234
 
Canada should stop subsidizing obsolescence and start competing for the next wave of innovation.

Problem is, our politicians are total idiot incompetents that give parasites all our money for nothing, and you idiots that voted for Liberals and NDP caused all of this,...you killed Canada.

October 17, 2025 | Canadian Auto Industry Faces Creative Destruction

Hilliard MacBeth

The Canadian auto industry is in deep trouble. Donald Trump’s new tariffs threaten cross-border trade — and U.S. automakers are already moving production south.

Here’s the kicker: Canada’s auto sector isn’t even Canadian. Toyota and Honda build three-quarters of the cars assembled here. American brands make the rest. And those are being moved south:

“In a major blow to Canada’s automotive sector, Stellantis announced plans on Tuesday to move production of the Jeep Compass to Illinois from Brampton, Ontario. Stellantis had about 3,000 workers there.” October 14, 2025

But the real threat isn’t political — it’s technological. The global shift to electric vehicles (EVs) is rewriting the rules of manufacturing. Chinese EV makers, led by BYD, are flooding world markets with advanced, low-cost cars that look more like iPhones on wheels than traditional vehicles.

Is there any way for Canada to keep its car industry alive?

This is the moment Joseph Schumpeter warned us about — creative destruction.
In his 1942 classic, Capitalism, Socialism and Democracy, the Austrian economist described capitalism as “a process of creative destruction … never stationary.”

And destruction is exactly what’s happening in Ontario’s auto belt.

A Canadian economist, Peter Howitt, who just received the Nobel Prize in Economics for his work on innovation-driven growth, once put it bluntly in The Globe and Mail:

“People need to leave jobs in dying or less productive industries … If Canada is to revive growth, we must recognize that job loss and business failure are part of the process.”

Painful words — but true.

Toyota and Honda’s Ontario plants churn out the RAV4, Lexus RX, and Honda CR-V — none of them pure EVs. Roughly 80% are shipped to the U.S. market. Together, automakers and parts suppliers employ 130,000 Canadians — less than 1% of the national workforce.

So, should we spend billions propping up an obsolete industry?

EVs are cheaper to build, simpler to assemble, and cleaner to run. An electric car has twenty moving parts versus two thousand in a combustion engine. The only complex piece — the battery — is dropping in cost every quarter.

Chinese firms like BYD are years ahead in this technology. Tesla is the only Western brand that keeps pace. Both are profitable, global, and growing.

Instead of fighting the future with tariffs, Canada should open the door — invite BYD, Tesla, and others to build EV plants here. We have what they need: critical minerals, skilled workers, and a stable market. In exchange, Canadians get affordable EVs and a stake in the future of mobility.

Trying to protect the past is a losing game.

As Schumpeter taught us, creative destruction is not a tragedy — it’s the engine of progress.

Canada should stop subsidizing obsolescence and start competing for the next wave of innovation.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext