Crystallex (KRY) Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Crystallex (KRY)

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Gary H who wrote (5745)	2/25/1998 5:00:00 PM
From: the Chief	Read Replies (1) of 10836

Gary H, I think the idea of PDG "entering into an illegal contract with CVG" proliferates the "evil empire" scenario. If I may reword that! Did PDG enter an agreement with CVG, with CVG representing the deal as legal? If in fact it is found that KRY owns LC than CVG misrepresented itself to PDG. In which case you have answered my question, thank you! PDG would have to go after CVG as CVG misrepresented the initial agreement. >>PDG thought they were getting in threw the back door with CVG, and it didn't pan out. This supports the "anti-PDG" position of this thread, so it is expected and accepted. However, I am in the "camp" that believes Mr. Wilson and PDG are honourable! That there "is" a misrepresentation somewhere, and I believe that the misrepresentation to be in MEM or CVG but not in KRY or PDG. I have stated before, I don't hold KRY or PDG but am extremely interested in the longterm impact this may have on Venezuelan mining! the Chief

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next