| Take Back Tesla urges pension funds to vote ‘no’ on Musk’s $1 trillion pay day 
 
   
 Jameson Dow | Oct 22 2025 - 10:58 am PT
 
 4 Comments
 
 
   
 A new campaign is adding to the growing chorus of pushback against  Tesla CEO Elon Musk’s absurdly large proposed $1 trillion pay package,  this time led by unions and public interest groups. The campaign  encourages individuals to get in contact with their pension or  retirement funds and ask them to vote against Musk’s payday.
 
 In September, Tesla’s board proposed  a stock award worth up to $1 trillion for  CEO Elon Musk. It includes several milestones regarding Tesla stock and  product performance, each of which unlocks tens of billions of dollars  for Musk.
 
 It’s the largest award proposed for any CEO of any company by  multiple orders of magnitude – with previous proposed Musk awards  holding the second and third place positions as well.
 
 In addition to that much-reported proposal, another proposal is up  for a vote which would create a special share reserve of 208 million  shares (current value $92 billion) which the Tesla board can give to  Elon Musk with no strings attached.
 
 Both proposals will be voted on by TSLA shareholders at Tesla’s shareholder meeting on November 6.
 
 Many groups have chimed in to raise the alarm about these proposals and how they’re bad for Tesla shareholders. Most recently,  the two largest advisory groups, ISS and Glass Lewis, recommended that shareholders vote against. Earlier, a  group of public pension funds  including the comptrollers of several US states, the American  Federation of Teachers, and a Swedish insurance group. Tesla has lashed  out with attacks on each of these groups after their dispassionate  analysis of the proposals’ flaws.
 
 We at Electrek also did a deep dive into the proposals, with  background and details on the proposals and how they’re bad for  employees and shareholders, which you can read here:  Elon Musk’s $1 trillion stock award gets more ridiculous the more you look into it
 
 Now a new group has joined the chorus, calling itself “Take Back  Tesla.” It’s led by unions, encouraging individuals with pension or  retirement funds to get in touch with the controllers of those funds and  ask them to vote no on Musk’s pay package.
 
 Take Back Tesla consists of the American Federation of Teachers (who  signed the previous pension fund letter) and the Communication Workers of America, who represent around 2.5 million workers combined.
 
 Several public interest groups have joined on, including Public  Citizen, Stop the Money Pipeline, Americans for Financial Reform, Eko,  and People’s Action Institute. These groups are generally focused on  reducing the power of corporations in politics, reducing wealth  concentration, and opposing the corrupting and polluting power of the  fossil fuel industry.
 
 The groups bring up some of the same points that have been brought up  before, but are more focused on public advocacy and Musk’s recent  political actions, in addition to protecting value for the common  shareholder.
 
 Rather than talking about dilution (which the proposals will  increase, removing rights and value from shareholders), Take Back Tesla  focuses more on the inequity involved in the plan. It  points out  that the proposed pay package for Musk tops out at a Tesla market cap  of $8.5 trillion, about 2x the current market cap of the most valuable  company on Earth, NVIDIA. However, Musk would be paid 2,000x as much as NVIDIA’s CEO Jensen Huang, who made $50 million last year.
 
 It also asserts that a Tesla employee making the median Tesla salary  would need to work 1.7 million years to match a single year of Musk’s  yearly compensation under the plan (we checked the salary numbers, and  it seems Take Back Tesla might be using a low estimate or not counting  stock-based compensation – but that doesn’t change the point too much,  especially since Tesla just  drained its employee stock reserve to give it all to Elon Musk).
 
 The groups are also particularly interested in the effects that Musk  himself has had on employees around the country. AFT president Randi  Weingarten said:
 
 The Tesla board, instead of upholding basic governance standards,  wants to green light an outrageous $1 trillion pay package for a CEO who  has spent most of the year engaged in childish political brawls, rather  than working to create shareholder value. To reward this destructive  behavior with an obscene salary is a slap in the face—not only to the  federal workers he’s fired, but to the retirees whose pensions are  invested in Tesla stock. We urge shareholders to join with us and demand  their state pension officials reject Musk’s money grab and confiscate  the Tesla board’s rubber stamp.
 
 The reason Take Back Tesla is interested in pension funds is because,  beyond individual Tesla shareholders, many people in the US are  invested in TSLA via their 401(k) or IRA. Since TSLA is one of the  largest companies on the market, almost every fund will hold some  exposure to it. Which means that this issue isn’t just of interest to  those who directly hold TSLA shares, but to almost everyone with any  exposure to the stock market – all of whom would be better off with more  stable leadership at the top of one of the largest companies in  America.
 
 It could seem strange that groups looking to stop the fossil fuel  industry would target Elon Musk, CEO of the largest American electric  car company. But Musk has recently proven himself to be one of the  fossil fuel industry’s greatest political allies.
 
 Musk  gave $288M, more money than any individual, to a  political effort which strives to harm EVs, and the group he donated that money to has put significant effort into  increasing oil use,  subsidizing gas cars and  destroying the climate, not just in the US but  abroad. This has  caused great harm to the US EV industry, but Musk has continued to offer rhetorical and monetary support regardless.
 
 In addition, during his time cosplaying as an unofficial government advisor, Musk  recommended the firing of hundreds of thousands of government employees, working to  balloon the government deficit  by making it less able to do its job. This is particularly of interest  to the unions involved in this effort, who protect the interests of the  very same public employees Musk targeted.
 
 Take Back Tesla urges institutional shareholders to “oppose excessive  CEO compensation and demand that any proposed pay package for Musk be  reasonable and rationally benchmarked to the compensation of CEOs at  other similarly sized companies.” The groups also oppose “the election  of any Tesla Board of Directors members who do not demonstrate  appropriate independence from the CEO and adherence to corporate  governance best practices.”
 
 For more information and to sign a petition which will be delivered to fund managers, visit  takebacktesla.com
 
 electrek.co
 |