SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Qualcomm Moderated Thread - please read rules before posting
QCOM 181.05-3.5%Oct 28 3:59 PM EDT
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
Recommended by:
abcs
AlfaNut
Art Bechhoefer
BDAZZ
Bill Wolf
Doug M.
Dr. John
HD911
hedgefund
jazzcat2000
JeffreyHF
Jim Mullens
John Hayman
Jon Koplik
Ken Carrillo
kozom
Lance Bredvold
manning18
matherandlowell
METMAN
mk511
NozRydr
pheilman_
PNUT
Prophet of Profits
Qpeeper
RoseCampion
ryhack
sbfm
southtech
techlvr
temco2
Tobias Ekman
vkvraju5
To: PNUT who wrote (196211)10/27/2025 4:00:43 PM
From: engineer34 Recommendations  Read Replies (7) of 196287
 
one more thing about nvidia versus qualcomm.

NVDA has one design, not so much low power. IMHO they design like Intel, at the highest power level to get the highest processing speed. they have not spent 30 years designing supoer low power stuff. Just high processing power stuff in big iron cpu centers.

On the other hand, Qualcomm has deisgned the lowest power possible for so many years dictated by smartphone design, so they can make high speed stuff run very low power. Big advantage to them in the power race.

I have said for ayear or two now that the person who comes up with the lowest power datacenter CPU wins. about 60-70% of the cost of a datacenter is the power bill. way more than the cost of hardware. In fact I think that if you can save 30-40% in power, then it is economically worth it to scrap your datacenter cpus and replace them with the lower power stuff.

I read a report alst year that the chat GPT first model took 68,000 KWH to produce. that is leterally a few hundred million in energy costs.

not sure NVIDIA can answer this push by Qualcomm any time soon.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  

HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News