SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Sioux Nation
DJT 15.97-1.2%3:55 PM EDT

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Wharf Rat who wrote (360748)10/28/2025 12:41:21 PM
From: S. maltophilia1 Recommendation

Recommended By
Cautious_Optimist

  Read Replies (2) of 360784
 
Half of us assholes on SI could be arrested for implied thoughtcrime if Bushart gets convicted. He doesn't have the means to make bail, and has to sit in jail for at least the 5 weeks before a bond hearing. No way he can fight this all the way to SCROTUS; all the pro bonos already been co-opted by the regime. Double jeopardy, in case some lower court acquits, is child's play after the excessive bail violation. The regime' shysters and ambulance chasers will find a way with the millions of billable hours they have from top law firms.

However, the Court expressed concern over the chilling effect of prosecutions in cases of vague threats: “The speaker’s fear of mistaking whether a statement is a threat; his fear of the legal system getting that judgment wrong; his fear, in any event, of incurring legal costs — all those may lead him to swallow words that are in fact not true threats.”

In prior cases, the Court also adopted a protective stance, requiring more than how words or actions were perceived. In Virginia v. Black (2003), the Court upheld the criminalization of cross burning when the act was intended as a threat: ‘True threats’ encompass those statements

Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext