| | | >>>I'm also starting to understand why Lincoln was put on Mount Rushmore.
Tom<<<
I'm starting to understand your not Tom...
LYIN LIXEN spewing bullshit daily
AI Overview
The claims that Judge James Boasberg approved an "Arctic Frost" investigation in violation of the law, kept it secret, and inserted himself into the "Alien Enemies Act" case to manufacture contempt proceedings are largely based on
allegations made by critics of the judge and the Trump administration, and do not represent a final, legally established finding of wrongdoing on his part.
Here is a breakdown of the claims:
- Approved the Arctic Frost investigation in direct violation of the law & kept Arctic Frost a secret in further violation of the law:
- "Arctic Frost" was a real FBI investigation (or case name for the elector case against Trump, the scope of which is debated) which has been the subject of significant congressional oversight by Senator Chuck Grassley.
- Judge Boasberg did not "approve" the overall investigation; rather, as a supervising judge, he reportedly granted specific requests related to the probe, such as authorizing subpoenas for telecommunication records of some Republican members of Congress.
- Critics, including Senator Rick Scott and President Trump, have accused Judge Boasberg of violating the law (specifically Section 6628) by ordering the telecom companies to conceal these subpoenas from the targeted individuals for a year. These are allegations of misconduct, not a confirmed legal violation. The legitimacy of these actions is part of ongoing political and legal disputes.
- Inserted himself in the Alien Enemies Act case to try to manufacture contempt proceedings against Trump, potentially imperiling our foreign relations:
- Judge Boasberg was the presiding judge in the case concerning the Trump administration's use of the Alien Enemies Act to deport Venezuelan migrants without due process. He did not "insert himself," as the case was brought before his court by the ACLU and Democracy Forward.
- He issued a temporary restraining order to stop the deportations and ordered any flights in the air to return. When two flights proceeded to El Salvador despite his order, he found "probable cause" to initiate criminal contempt proceedings against the administration, not Trump personally. He did not ultimately issue a final contempt ruling, as an appeals court paused the process and later threw out his finding.
- The Trump administration and its supporters argued that Judge Boasberg's actions constituted "judicial overreach" and an improper intrusion on the Executive Branch's foreign policy powers, which they claimed could imperil foreign relations. Judge Boasberg maintained that the "rule of law depends on obedience to judicial orders" and that the government acted in "willful disregard" of his order.
In summary, the actions described are real events that occurred in the context of legal and political conflicts, but they are presented through the lens of specific allegations and criticisms made by opponents of the judge and his rulings, not as definitive legal conclusions of wrongdoing by Judge Boasberg himself. |
|
