| | | All the red ink, caps, bolden, incomprehensible (to me) Chinese characters, stylized language, bias-injected AI ‘intelligence,’ etc., doesn’t change the fact that an apples to apples comparison (here, the USD) shows without any doubt whatsoever that the NASDAQ 100, NVDA, etc., over time have been hugely better investments than gold, hugely better. It is absolutely not even close.
The contrary suggestion is 100% male bovine manure. No, 200% manure.
Gold has its place, to be sure. But a very, very minor one.
I can lose the purchase price on the bulk of my NASDAQ stocks and still come out way better than if I had bought gold at the same time I bought the stock. And many pay dividends.
Anyway, spread this ‘theory’ of yours as much as you wish. There are undoubtedly many who think you are correct. Good luck to them. They’ll need it. |
|