I get where you’re coming from, it’s totally normal to look at the world, see weird coincidences and huge institutions, and try to make sense of it all.
But a lot of what you’re repeating here blends a few real facts with big leaps that aren’t actually supported once you dig into them.
A few things to untangle: HAARP isn’t a mind-control or crowd-control system
HAARP is a real facility, but it’s just a high-frequency ionospheric research station. It can heat a patch of the ionosphere a few hundred kilometers up, not manipulate people, weather, or thoughts.
- No aluminum poles standing up,
- No mass-behavior influence,
- No “global network”.
The U.S. military funded it, sure, because communications and radar bounce off the ionosphere. But “mind control”? Nothing in the physics supports that.
ARPA / DARPA wasn’t a secret re-brand
It wasn’t changed to sound “less suspicious”. ARPA (1958) was renamed DARPA in 1972 to put the agency more clearly under the Department of Defense. It flipped back to ARPA again briefly in the 1990s under Clinton, and then back to DARPA.
So the idea that this change signals a hidden shift in mission doesn’t fit the timeline or the politics.
“Templars / Wall Street” is a modern myth
There’s zero evidence that:
- Templar families run the specialist system,
- modern market makers descend from medieval military monks, or
- Wall Street started as a “casino” run by secret banking families from the 1100s.
Early central banking actually emerged in the 1600s with the Amsterdam Wisselbank and later the Bank of England, not with Templars. Medieval Europe didn’t even have the legal structures for modern banking.
Leasing of gold in the 1100s never happened
Nothing in 12th-century Europe resembled gold leasing or international bullion markets. The Templars acted more like a combination of:- security firm,
- international courier,
- and deposit service for nobles on crusade.
There was no global system, no financial derivatives, and no fractional reserves.
Martin Armstrong writes interesting things, but he mixes history with speculation heavily — none of his “global banking since 1100 AD” material holds up to actual medieval economic records.
Secret mega-projects funded by Wall Street?
Governments absolutely fund classified projects — that part is true.
But:- hidden billions flowing through stock specialists,
- for global shadow operations,
- controlled by ancient bloodlines…
That’s a narrative with zero evidence and a lot of assumptions stacked on each other.
People confuse:- “complex” with
- “coordinated in secret”.
Governments, intelligence agencies, and markets operate with large incentives, but they’re not run by a unified hidden command structure, they compete constantly.
“Some things unknown” — true. But that doesn’t make the leap correct.
We will always have unknowns.
That doesn’t validate any particular theory. It just means we don’t know.
One discovery could change my mind — absolutely. That applies to anything.
But until then, history and physics matter more than “it sounds plausible”. |