SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Qualcomm Moderated Thread - please read rules before posting
QCOM 175.25+0.6%Dec 19 9:30 AM EST
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
From: QCOM_HYPE_TRAIN11/23/2025 10:23:04 PM
2 Recommendations

Recommended By
Lance Bredvold
vkvraju5

   of 197011
 
From the Court: Qualcomm v. Arm: Along with Arm trying to license TLA cores that were commercially unreasonable they apparently jacked the prices of peripheral IP as well. Things like GIC-700, MMU-700, ELA-600 -- That is a generic interrupt controller, the memory management unit, and Embedded Logic Analyzer. Qualcomm ended up absorbing the cost for this but is now asking for damages as this was apparently a violation of the TLA. Arm is arguing that Qualcomm agreed and absorbed the cost that for the peripheral IP it was indeed commercially feasible.

One of the items that we haven't seen is the damages to Qualcomm that have been calculated by the expert witnesses, that is all heavily redacted. But there appears to be a missing redaction in one of the expert witness rebuttal reports where they mention "Several Million" for this overcharging of ip



From Arm's defense:



From Arms expert witness rebuttle

Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  

HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News