No worries, I know you don’t understand, and so does Armstrong.
In fact, Armstrong depends on people not understanding; that’s exactly how his game works.
Armstrong doesn’t understand anything either, but he knows that — your posts are the proof.
And once again, you proved my point without realizing it.
You say “it’s all connected” because you feel it is—not because you’ve established any actual causal link.
You’re stacking unrelated events (9/11, COVID, JFK, Putin, Trump, banks, borders, Biden, MH17, Hillary, NATO, Building 7, Armstrong’s legal case) into one giant unified plot run by an omnipotent cabal.
That’s not research.
That’s pattern-gluing.
When everything gets lumped together, you stop distinguishing:- coincidence from cause
- correlation from conspiracy
- incompetence from intention
- politics from plots
And you end up saying things like “Where’s the conspiracy?” while listing 15 conspiracies in a single paragraph.
Armstrong Being “Framed”
You keep insisting Armstrong was framed because… he says he was framed.
That’s not evidence.
That’s loyalty.
Every convicted financial criminal in history claims they were framed.
If Armstrong’s “True AI” could predict everything, then:- why didn’t he predict his own indictment?
- why didn’t he predict his own contempt charges?
- why didn’t he predict the government seizing his records?
- why didn’t he predict spending seven years in prison?
His “supercomputer” apparently forecasts global cycles but couldn’t forecast his own federal case.
That doesn’t add up.
And the idea that he stored “documents that would put CIA, NATO, and Hillary in prison” in Building 7—a building he had no control over—is the kind of story people believe because they want it to be true, not because it passes the smell test.
“They murdered how many?”
You’re taking every tragedy—wars, fires, pandemics, political assassinations, border issues—and attributing all of them to the same shadow actors with zero separation or analysis.
That is exactly the definition of a grand conspiracy worldview.
Not research.
Not logic.
A worldview where the government is:- incompetent at everything yet simultaneously
- flawlessly orchestrating dozens of massive global conspiracies without a single leaked document, rogue whistleblower, or independent corroboration
That contradiction alone should give you pause.
“Replace the judiciary with AI”
This is the most ironic part.
If Armstrong’s AI is so perfect, why didn’t it keep him out of prison?
Why didn’t it prevent him from getting held in contempt?
Why didn’t it prevent his clients from suing him?
Why didn’t it prevent regulators from descending on him?
If the man couldn’t even keep his own legal situation under control, why in the world would anyone put him—or his unverified “code”—in charge of the judiciary?
You’re arguing for the system to be replaced by the same guy you say was crushed by that system.
That’s not logic; it’s devotion.
Bottom line
You aren’t connecting dots—you’re drawing lines between dots that don’t belong together and insisting the picture must be real because it “feels right.”
Believing that governments lie sometimes? Reasonable.
Believing that powerful institutions act in self-interest? Absolutely.
Believing that every major event in the world for the past 60 years is part of one masterful, seamless plot run by the same invisible puppeteers?
That’s not open-minded.
That’s surrendering judgment. |
