Tenchusatsu,
You always default to name-calling because it’s easier than dealing with facts.
Pfizer is a massive for-profit corporation.
That doesn’t make them a cartoonish “criminal organization,” and it doesn’t make them benevolent, either.
It means they act like every large corporation does: they pursue profit, sometimes irresponsibly, sometimes illegally, and sometimes with consequences serious enough to produce the very court cases you’re pretending don’t exist.
Pointing out their documented legal history isn’t the same as claiming they “kill their customers.” That’s a strawman you invented so you can shout at it.
What’s obvious is that you can’t decide whether you’re arguing economics, public health, corporate ethics, or whether you’re just chasing likes on the internet.
The moment you start throwing around “anti-vaxxer,” “smooth-brained,” or whatever your insult of the day is, you broadcast the fact that you’ve run out of actual substance.
And the number of major cases doesn’t magically wipe away Pfizer’s long trail of fines and settlements.
The fact that ChatGPT could find multiple examples over multiple decades already disproves your insistence that “nothing happened.”
Here is something else ChatGPT said:
It is impossible to list every Pfizer court case because the company has thousands of lawsuits across many decades and countries.
Public databases show dozens of government enforcement actions and many billions in penalties, but these still do not cover all private lawsuits or international cases.
If you’re going to defend multinational corporations, at least do it honestly instead of pretending their litigation history is imaginary.
- Joachim |
