SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : ASML Holding NV
ASML 1,072-1.5%2:56 PM EST

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
From: BeenRetired12/11/2025 8:30:08 AM
   of 42697
 
AI the Shrink n Stack Big Kahuna. Other Thingy trickle-down.

You’re seeing the pattern exactly the way the semiconductor industry sees it, Mike — and yes, AI is now the single biggest accelerator of “shrink-and-stack,” and everything else benefits downstream. Let me lay it out in a way that matches your systems-thinking style.

Why AI is the #1 driver of Shrink-and-Stack
AI hyperscalers (Microsoft, Google, Meta, Amazon, Apple) are demanding:
  • smaller nodes (5nm ? 3nm ? 2nm ? 1.4nm)

  • more HBM stacks (HBM3E ? HBM4 ? HBM4E)

  • more advanced packaging (CoWoS, SoIC, 3D stacking, hybrid bonding)

  • more wafer-scale integration (Cerebras, DensityAI, Tesla Dojo successors)

This demand is so extreme that foundries and OSATs are reorganizing their entire roadmaps around it.

When AI becomes the priority customer, everyone else gets the trickle-down.

Shrink
AI workloads require:
  • maximum compute density

  • maximum memory bandwidth

  • minimum latency

  • minimum energy per operation

That forces TSMC, Samsung, Intel Foundry to push nodes faster than they otherwise would. AI is the reason 2nm is being accelerated. AI is the reason backside power delivery is being rushed. AI is the reason EUV and High-NA EUV are scaling aggressively.

Without AI, node progression would slow dramatically.

Stack
AI accelerators are now the world’s biggest consumers of:

  • HBM

  • 2.5D interposers

  • 3D stacked logic + memory

  • wafer-to-wafer hybrid bonding

HBM demand is so overwhelming that:

  • automotive is being deprioritized

  • consumer electronics are being pushed to older nodes

  • even data-center CPUs are being redesigned around HBM availability
AI is the reason packaging is now the bottleneck instead of lithography.

So does every other device get better chips sooner?Yes — but with a twist.

What gets better sooner
Anything that can use older nodes benefits:

  • phones

  • laptops

  • IoT

  • automotive

  • industrial

  • autonomous machinery (your Deere example)

Why? Because AI is hogging the leading-edge nodes, so foundries expand capacity across the board. Older nodes get cheaper, more available, and more mature.

This is why:

  • 7nm is becoming the new “mainstream”

  • 16nm/28nm are becoming dirt cheap

  • automotive shortages are easing

  • microcontrollers are flooding back into supply

AI’s hunger for cutting-edge silicon subsidizes the entire ecosystem.

What does not get better sooner
Anything that competes directly with AI for:

  • 3nm/2nm wafers

  • HBM

  • advanced packaging

…gets pushed back.

This includes:

  • flagship smartphone SoCs

  • high-end laptop CPUs/GPUs

  • automotive ADAS chips

  • AR/VR headsets

  • networking ASICs

These sectors are already being told: “AI gets priority. You wait.”

The clean summary
AI is the engine pulling the entire semiconductor train forward. It forces shrink. It forces stack. It forces packaging innovation. It forces capacity expansion.

And yes — every other device gets better chips sooner, except the ones that compete directly with AI for the same bleeding-edge resources.

If you want, I can map out how this affects:

  • autonomous machinery (Deere, Cat, Komatsu)

  • automotive ADAS

  • wafer-scale players (Cerebras, DensityAI)

  • the HBM supply chain

  • TSMC’s 2nm and 1.4nm roadmaps

Just tell me where you want to take it next.

Autonomous (vehicles, ag, industrial) vs AI Server Farms
Short version
AI data centers consume orders of magnitude more semiconductor capacity than autonomous systems. Not 2×. Not 5×. More like 50×–200×, depending on the metric.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext