SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : The Trump Presidency

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
Recommended by:
longz
To: Ron who wrote (356814)12/15/2025 1:33:57 PM
From: Thomas M.1 Recommendation  Read Replies (2) of 358032
 
The corrupt Obama DOJ, including James Comey and Andrew McCabe, explicitly blocked federal agents from issuing subpoenas about the Clinton Foundation or conducting interviews about the Clintons in order to protect them from scrutiny during the 2016 election. At the same time, the Obama DOJ was using the bogus, Clinton-funded dossier as pretext for illegally spying on the Trump campaign.

  • On July 20, 2016—111 days before the 2016 election—an agent with the FBI’s Criminal Investigative Division ordered that, “based on the sensitivities surrounding the Clinton Foundation,” agents were prohibited from issuing subpoenas, conducting interviews or sharing information related to the case with other offices so as to avoid “[creating] any impression we are investigating the Clinton Foundation or the Clintons.”
  • In November 2016, FBI Headquarters, while under the leadership of then-Deputy Director Andrew McCabe, stepped in to block the Clinton Foundation investigative team from accessing potentially incriminating evidence located on the laptop of Anthony Weiner, the husband of Hillary Clinton’s political aide, Huma Abedin. McCabe, among others, recommended the information instead be routed to the FBI’s “Midyear” investigative team.
  • After the investigation was reopened in 2017, Main Justice holdovers from the previous administration allegedly provided prosecutors in the United States Attorney’s Office for the Eastern District of Arkansas (EDAR) with documents that omitted information regarding DOJ and FBI leadership’s interference. Additional requests the EDAR made to the FBI in 2018 “ruffled some feathers” and didn’t result in a response.
  • An EDAR prosecutor concluded “there appear to be conflicts of interest for the leadership [at Main Justice, including the Public Integrity Section,] related to the 2016 [Clinton] investigations that undermine any confidence we might normally have in looking to them for assistance.”

judiciary.senate.gov

Tom
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext