SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Bonefish who wrote (1577318)12/15/2025 2:29:22 PM
From: Bill3 Recommendations

Recommended By
Bonefish
locogringo
longz

   of 1578452
 
Trump's style often includes sarcasm, self-deprecating humor, or playful banter—especially when interacting with reporters he views skeptically (like those from CBS, given his history of criticizing the network).

An exchange happened on October 15, 2025, in the Oval Office, with a model of the proposed arch on his desk. After Trump announced it as a national tribute for America's 250th anniversary, CBS reporter Ed O'Keefe asked, "Who is it for?" Trump mockingly said, "Me," followed by laughter. "It’s going to be beautiful." O'Keefe then jokingly quipped, "The Arc de Trump?" which stuck as the media nickname. Trump has not repeated that nickname.

Many reports present the "Me" response as a serious answer with Trump stating a personal element, highlighting the project's perceived self-aggrandizing vibe. However, given the context—a lighthearted moment waving a model around, plus Trump's frequent use of exaggeration or mockery toward press questions—it's clear to interpret it as him kidding or trolling the reporter rather than a literal confession.

Trump has a long track record of similar sarcastic deflections (e.g., past instances where he's claimed statements were jokes). He consistently frames the arch publicly as a national tribute for America's 250th anniversary, tying it to icons like the Lincoln Memorial and founders' heritage. No follow-up from him has clarified it as serious self-homage.

Ultimately, it's classic Trump ambiguity: the remark lands as humorous boasting to supporters, but fuels critics' "vanity project" narrative. Whether it was pure jest or half-serious, it definitely amplified the controversy!

- Grok
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext